Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
James McCabe vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our McCabe vs Wild analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
James McCabe vs Thiago Seyboth Wild Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: McCabe 0 - 1 Wild
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), McCabe has won 51.25% of points on their second serve, while Wild has won 49.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show McCabe, in recent form, has won 45.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wild has won 51.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.31% and 27.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: McCabe has saved 60.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wild has saved 65.75% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year McCabe has won 53.33% of matches played (W/L 32/ 28), with Wild winning 57.97% (W/L 40/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: McCabe has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 88/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Wild has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 192/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, McCabe has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18), where as Wild has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 37.93% of matches (W/L 11/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with McCabe winning 0 times and Wild being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with McCabe winning 0 and Wild winning 2. The last match between McCabe and Wild was at the Rothesay International - Eastbourne, 25-06-2024, First, Grass with Thiago Seyboth Wild getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: McCabe and Wild have played a deciding set 0 times, with McCabe winning 0 times and Wild 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with McCabe winning 0, and Wild 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, McCabe has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.1 while Wild has played against players with an average rank of 218.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, McCabe has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wild has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, McCabe has converted 38.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wild has converted 41.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
334
Rank
258
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
74
Rank
58
High
24
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
58% (109-78)
Career Total W/L
57% (228-173)
56% (24-19)
YTD W/L
51% (19-18)
$25,840
Career Prize Money
$784,720
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For James McCabe vs Thiago Seyboth Wild For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For McCabe VS Wild
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | James McCabe | Thiago Seyboth Wild |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:59 | 1:40:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (50/64) | 68% (51/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (35/50) | 69% (35/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 29% (4/14) | 50% (12/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (28/75) | 39% (25/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
James McCabe
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | James McCabe | Thiago Seyboth Wild |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (24/19) | 51% (19/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (53/47) | 53% (49/44) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (496/470) | 50% (445/438) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) | 56% (9/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 44% (8/10) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 67% (2/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.61 | 0.45 |
| Aces Total | 287 | 194 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 93 | 111 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:6 | 1:55:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 200.88 | 176.51 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1839/3072) | 63% (1809/2874) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1304/1839) | 70% (1263/1809) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (633/1233) | 49% (523/1065) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (109/281) | 41% (97/234) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (1152/3097) | 36% (971/2687) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 39% (7/11) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (13/10) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (23/41) | 53% (18/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 41% (9/22) | 50% (5/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 38% (5/13) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (22/20) | 80% (20/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (22/2) | 20% (20/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (21/4) | 18% (17/3) |
James McCabe Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Pietro Orlando Fellin
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
James McCabe
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
87 of
133)
1st Serve %
64%
(
84 of
131)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
58 of
84)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
48 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
49 of
131)
134
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(1) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Mackenzie Mcdonald
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
James McCabe
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
James McCabe
50%
(
13 of
26)
1st Serve %
39%
(
12 of
31)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
92%
(
12 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
43
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Martyn Pawelski
55%
(
57 of
104)
1st Serve %
50%
(
47 of
94)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
11
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
57%
(
27 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
James McCabe
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
James McCabe
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
James McCabe
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Thiago Seyboth Wild Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Paul Jubb
63%
(
101 of
160)
1st Serve %
57%
(
103 of
181)
17
Aces
10
7
Double Faults
8
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
70 of
103)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
40%
(
64 of
160)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
70 of
181)
166
Total Points Won
175
|
1-6 3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
15
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
42 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
5 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
James McCabe
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
78%
(
45 of
58)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
68 of
116)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
65%
(
31 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
120
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(5) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Gregoire Barrere
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Thiago Seyboth Wild
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
McCabe Vs Wild Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of McCabe are available here and Wild photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
