James McCabe vs Cing-Yang Meng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 03 Nov at 11:10 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

J. McCabe vs C. Meng

James McCabe
James McCabe

Flag AUS AUS

w
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
Cing-Yang Meng
Cing-Yang Meng

Flag TPE TPE

l
l
w
l
l
w
w
w
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

22
Age
27
-
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
194
C. Rank
891
164
Best Rank
844
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$358.1K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
Ambidextrous

Head-to-head: McCabe 1 - 0 Meng

They have played 3 sets in total, with James McCabe winning 2 and Cing-Yang Meng winning 1. The last match between James McCabe and Cing-Yang Meng was at the Taipei Challenger, 03-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with James McCabe getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 7-5.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
McCabe1
Meng0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1Taipei Challenger(11-03-25)

I.hard
AUS Flag
James McCabe
6
6
7
TPE Flag
Cing-Yang Meng
7
4
5

J. McCabe vs C. Meng H2H Profile

Stats
$358,055Career Prize Money$0
57.24% (174-130)Career Total W/L49.78% (112-113)
1Indoor0
2Titles0
1Total H2H Matches0
25.00% (1-3)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

J. McCabe vs C. Meng Match Preview:

  • How do the players compare in second serve performance? James Mc Cabe has won 42.14% of points on his recent second serve, slightly below Cing-Yang Meng's 42.99%.
  • Examining return games, James Mc Cabe has the edge in converting 44.12% of second serve returns, compared to Cing-Yang Meng's 42.31%.
  • In first serve return points, Cing-Yang Meng leads with 25.75% against Mc Cabe's 23.13%.
  • Under pressure, James Mc Cabe saves 54.40% of breakpoints, outperforming Meng's 50.00% save rate.
  • Who has a better recent form overall? Meng holds a slight edge with a 50% match win rate over the last year, while Mc Cabe has 46.27%.
  • On their favored surfaces, Mc Cabe excels on Hard courts with a 60% win rate, whereas Meng prefers Clay with a similar percentage.
  • Regarding playing levels, Mc Cabe has extensive experience in Challengers/ITF tournaments, while Meng has been active in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments.
  • Against ranked opponents, Mc Cabe has faced players with an average ranking of 248.3, whereas Meng's opposition was stronger, averaging 171.63.
  • In deciding sets, Meng shows greater resilience with a 67% win rate, narrowly surpassing Mc Cabe's 62%.
  • It's crucial to review current event performances to grasp which player might bring a better form into this match.

Editorial Prediction (November 3, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match offers an intriguing battle, given the stats highlight each player's unique strengths. James Mc Cabe showcases notable resilience under pressure, excelling in breakpoint saves.

Conversely, Cing-Yang Meng demonstrates superior performance in first serve returns and against tougher opponents. Meng also holds a slight advantage in recent match win rates.

Factoring in second serve performance, first serve returns, and deciding set success, Cing-Yang Meng appears to have a marginal edge.

Assuming no unforeseen circumstances or fluctuations in form, Cing-Yang Meng is the favored player to secure victory in this matchup.

James McCabe vs Cing-Yang Meng Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. McCabe vs C. Meng H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won1
19Games Won16
20Aces (Total)5
1Total Double Faults7
2:43:30Average Match Time2:43:30
60% (62/103)1st Serve %57% (63/110)
82% (51/62)1st Serve Win %79% (50/63)
61% (25/41)2nd Serve Win %47% (22/47)
29% (2/7)Break Pts Won %0% (0/4)
35% (38/110)Return Points Win %26% (27/103)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: McCabe 46%, Meng 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: McCabe 48%, Meng 45%.
Break Points Saved %: McCabe 61%, Meng 51%.

J. McCabe Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardPlayford Challenger - 24-11-2025

QF

AUSR. Hijikata
L
7-6(2) 6-2

R2

AUSM. Polmans
W
6-2 7-6(3)

R1

JAMB. Bicknell
W
6-4 6-1
HardSydney Challenger - 17-11-2025

SF

JPNH. Matsuoka
L
7-5 6-4

QF

AUSR. Hijikata
W
6-3 7-5

C. Meng Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardTaipei Challenger - 03-11-2025

R1

AUSJ. McCabe
L
6-7(5) 6-4 7-5
HardM25 Qian Daohu - 27-10-2025

R2

CHNY. Cong
L
6-7(3) 6-1 6-2

R1

NZLM. Statham
W
1-6 6-4 6-2

Q3

TPEC. Kuan
W
5-4 ret.

Q1

CHNZ. Hui
W
2-6 6-4 10-6
banner

J. McCabe vs C. Meng Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
57.24% (174/130)YTD Win/Loss49.78% (112/113)
55.02% (389/318)Sets Win/Loss49.30% (248/255)
51.69% (3510/3281)Games Win/Loss49.64% (2341/2375)
60.17% (142/94)Hard Win/Loss48.63% (71/75)
40.00% (12/18)Clay Win/Loss55.71% (39/31)
50.00% (5/5)Indoor Hard W/L22.22% (2/7)
53.57% (15/13)Grass Win/Loss0% (0/0)
0.64Aces Per Game0.12
2112Aces Total265
0.2Double Faults Per Game0.14
678Total Double Faults315
1:43:32Average Match Time1st Match
377.32Average Opponent Rank334.73
60% (12357/20563)1st Serve %68% (6393/9363)
73% (8961/12357)1st Serve Win %62% (3991/6393)
49% (4037/8206)2nd Serve Win %49% (1440/2969)
41% (736/1817)Break Points Won % (Total)42% (320/761)
37% (7662/20439)Return Points Win %37% (3245/8882)
41.67% (5/7)Slam W/L0% (0/0)
33.33% (1/2)Masters W/L0% (0/0)
31.58% (6/13)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
53.29% (89/78)Challenger W/L22.22% (2/7)
70.87% (73/30)Futures W/L50.93% (110/106)
57% (167/291)Best of 3 Sets Win %51% (110/216)
38% (3/8)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/2)
52% (67/130)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)49% (25/51)
58% (55/95)Deciding Set Win %59% (35/59)
88% (162/142)1st Set Won, Won Match86% (111/95)
12% (162/20)1st Set Won, Lost Match14% (111/15)
23% (142/32)1st Set Lost, Won Match14% (114/16)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Mon, 01 Dec, 09:00 AM
Prediction
INDU. Kamboj
INDA. V. Duddupudi
W1
1.22
W2
3.74
Mon, 01 Dec, 08:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Kodancha
INDC. Warik
W1
2.58
W2
1.43
Mon, 01 Dec, 07:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Munim
INDA. Venkataraman
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Sun, 30 Nov, 10:05 PM
Prediction
COLJ. S. Gomezq
COLN. Mejia2
W1
4.45
W2
1.159