Jakub Paul vs Zakhar Trapeznikov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Trapeznikov analysis and find out who is favored!
Jakub Paul vs Zakhar Trapeznikov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 51.53% of points on his second serve, while Trapeznikov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 58.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Trapeznikov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 58.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Trapeznikov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 62.12% of matches played (W/L 41/ 25), with Trapeznikov winning 55.56% (W/L 5/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30). Trapeznikov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 95/ 81), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 38/ 20), where as Trapeznikov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 5/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Paul winning 2 and Trapeznikov winning 1. The last match between Paul and Trapeznikov was at the Switzerland F3 (Sion), 21-08-2018, First, Clay with Jakub Paul getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Trapeznikov have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paul winning 1 times and Trapeznikov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 0, and Trapeznikov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.88 while Trapeznikov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Trapeznikov has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 50.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Trapeznikov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paul 1 - 0 Trapeznikov
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
522
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (173-145)
Career Total W/L
53% (104-92)
59% (13-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,285
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Paul VS Trapeznikov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Jakub Paul | Zakhar Trapeznikov |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 15 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
Avg Match Time | 2:48:0 | 2:48:0 |
1st Serve % | 50% (58/115) | 69% (69/100) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (36/58) | 49% (34/69) |
2nd Serve Win% | 35% (20/57) | 35% (11/31) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 45% (9/20) |
Return Points W% | 55% (55/100) | 51% (59/115) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Paul VS Trapeznikov H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 2-6 6-3 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Zakhar Trapeznikov
50%
(
58 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
69 of
100)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
9
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
35%
(
20 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
51%
(
59 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
55 of
100)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jakub Paul | Zakhar Trapeznikov |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 59% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 56% (28/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (244/228) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
Aces Total | 28 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
DFs Total | 35 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:40:35 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 240.41 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (1024/1533) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (633/1024) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (255/509) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 51% (79/156) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (656/1526) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 59% (10/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (12/21) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Zakhar Trapeznikov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Tibo Colson
Player
Zakhar Trapeznikov
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Zakhar Trapeznikov
Player
Carlo Venturini
80%
(
72 of
90)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zakhar Trapeznikov
Player
Ronan Jachuck
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Renlong Pang
Player
Zakhar Trapeznikov
43%
(
23 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
1
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
48%
(
11 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
56%
(
30 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Mirko Martinez
Player
Zakhar Trapeznikov
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more