Jakub Mensik vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Mensik vs N. Fatic

Jakub Mensik
CZE
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
31
-
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
19
C. Rank
214
16
Best Rank
191
1
Total Titles
0
1
YTD Titles
0
$3.3M
Career Money
$74.0K
-
Plays
Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic
BIH
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
20
Age
31
-
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
19
C. Rank
214
16
Best Rank
191
1
Total Titles
0
1
YTD Titles
0
$3.3M
Career Money
$74.0K
-
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Mensik 1 - 0 Fatic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jakub Mensik winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Jakub Mensik and Nerman Fatic was at the Manama Challenger, 14-02-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Jakub Mensik getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mensik | 1 |
| Fatic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Manama Challenger(02-14-24)
Jakub Mensik
6
6
Nerman Fatic
1
4
J. Mensik vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
J. Mensik vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jakub Mensik has won 48.17% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jakub Mensik, in recent form, has won 46.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.62% and 28.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jakub Mensik has saved 53.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 53.85% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jakub Mensik has won 59.02% of matches played (W/L 36/25), with Nerman Fatic winning 73.91% (W/L 51/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jakub Mensik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 76/34), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Jakub Mensik has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 10/11), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jakub Mensik winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jakub Mensik winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0.
- The last match between Jakub Mensik and Nerman Fatic was at the Manama Challenger, 14-02-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Jakub Mensik getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:48.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jakub Mensik has played against opponents with an average rank of 71.85 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 338.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jakub Mensik has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 84% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jakub Mensik has converted 30.40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 33.70% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jakub Mensik vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Mensik vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:56:48 | Average Match Time | 0:56:48 |
| 64% (30/47) | 1st Serve % | 57% (28/49) |
| 83% (25/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (20/28) |
| 71% (12/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (9/21) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/3) |
| 41% (20/49) | Return Points Win % | 21% (10/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Mensik 50%, Fatic 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Mensik 48%, Fatic 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Mensik 66%, Fatic 61%.
J. Mensik Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | W | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | w/o | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(1) 6-7(7) 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 4-1 ret. | ||
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

J. Mensik vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.14% (151/92) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.47% (404/287) |
| 59.73% (359/242) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.49% (890/658) |
| 52.50% (3045/2755) | Games Win/Loss | 53.03% (7602/6734) |
| 69.09% (76/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 58.02% (47/34) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 57.89% (22/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.48% (20/26) |
| 42.86% (6/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.71 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 2027 | Aces Total | 1598 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 876 | Total Double Faults | 1517 |
| 1:46:39 | Average Match Time | 1:20:1 |
| 288.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.29 |
| 59% (10617/18088) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23791/35820) |
| 75% (7934/10617) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15579/23791) |
| 49% (3636/7475) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5772/12029) |
| 42% (670/1611) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1969/4222) |
| 38% (6904/18059) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15618/36165) |
| 68.00% (17/8) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 63.16% (24/14) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 62.50% (5/3) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 55.32% (26/21) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 55.38% (36/29) | Challenger W/L | 52.89% (119/106) |
| 72.41% (42/16) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 65% (140/217) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/662) |
| 50% (11/22) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 56% (63/113) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 53% (43/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/189) |
| 84% (160/135) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (394/348) |
| 16% (160/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (394/42) |
| 19% (83/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (297/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction04:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction02:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 20/11/25
Prediction02:15 PM 20/11/25
Prediction03:00 AM 21/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Noma Akugue Noha Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Miho Kuramochi Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Miriam Bianca Bulgaru vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Filip Misolic Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

19 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Matteo Berrettini vs Jurij Rodionov Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ITA – 19th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
14:35
H2H 0-2
12:05
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
20:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP-CZE
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal