Jacopo Vasami vs Sebastian Sorger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Mar at 02:07 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Vasami vs S. Sorger

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vasami 1 - 0 Sorger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jacopo Vasami winning 2 and Sebastian Sorger winning 0. The last match between Jacopo Vasami and Sebastian Sorger was at the M15 Rovinj, 20-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Jacopo Vasami getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vasami | 1 |
| Sorger | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Rovinj(03-20-25)
J. Vasami vs S. Sorger H2H Profile
J. Vasami vs S. Sorger Match Preview:
What does the second serve reveal about Vasami and Sorger's current form? Over the past six months, Vasami has dominated their second serve, capturing 48.44% of points, while Sorger trails with 39.77%. This particular statistic often strongly correlates with match outcomes, giving Vasami the upper hand in consistency and reliability on their second serve.
How about their return game prowess? On second serve returns, Sorger slightly edges Vasami, securing 46.58% of points compared to Vasami's 44.74%. The first serve return paints a similar picture with Sorger maintaining a slight lead at 31.68% over Vasami's 28.93%. These return stats propose that Sorger may have a tactical advantage when disrupting their opponent's serve.
Under pressure, who stands tall? Saving breakpoints is crucial in a tight match. Vasami has demonstrated robustness, saving 45.45% of pressure points, while Sorger has managed a slightly lower rate at 40.48%. This suggests that Vasami might be better equipped to handle those crucial moments that could swing the match.
What's more impressive than serving and returning? Why, performance, of course. Vasami and Sorger have a similar match win rate in the past year, Vasami with 60% (W/L 3/2), and Sorger narrowly better at 60.34% (W/L 35/23). Their surface preferences show contrasting strengths; Vasami shines on clay with a win percentage of 60%, whereas Sorger dominates hard courts at 62%. Furthermore, in terms of the player level, both have competed mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, though Sorger wins more matches at 64.15% (W/L 34/19).
Does opponent rank influence predictions? In the last twelve months, Vasami's opponents have averaged a ranking of 448.4, while Sorger's have been stronger at 422.05. Deciding sets might just seal the fate—Vasami has faltered, winning none over the past year, but Sorger has clinched 38% of them. This statistic makes Sorger a tenacious contender should the match go the distance.
What about breakpoint chances? Vasami's conversion rate of 50% in recent form doesn't stand up to Sorger’s 60%. Scenarios like these deliver telling information for those betting live, highlighting Sorger's aggressive play when opportunities arise.
Amid the wealth of stats, Sorger's stronger numbers in returns, breaks, and deciding set victories, coupled with playing against higher-ranked opponents, suggest they may have the slight edge in a competitive, unpredictable face-off.
Jacopo Vasami vs Sebastian Sorger Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Vasami vs S. Sorger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0:14:54 | Average Match Time | 0:14:54 |
| 78% (7/9) | 1st Serve % | 78% (7/9) |
| 86% (6/7) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 100% (2/2) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 44% (4/9) | Return Points Win % | 11% (1/9) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Vasami Recent Matches Played
S. Sorger Recent Matches Played

J. Vasami vs S. Sorger Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.85% (14/13) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.14% (152/105) |
| 50.79% (32/31) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.62% (344/253) |
| 50.00% (307/307) | Games Win/Loss | 53.53% (2972/2580) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.97% (44/27) |
| 53.85% (14/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.06% (108/78) |
| 0.51 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 154 | Aces Total | 192 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 88 | Total Double Faults | 428 |
| 1:37:11 | Average Match Time | 1:30:22 |
| 427.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 421.03 |
| 55% (998/1826) | 1st Serve % | 72% (10617/14658) |
| 71% (712/998) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6557/10617) |
| 52% (427/828) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2029/4041) |
| 41% (57/139) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (852/1818) |
| 36% (615/1706) | Return Points Win % | 45% (6874/15429) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Challenger W/L | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Futures W/L | 60.91% (148/95) |
| 52% (14/27) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (146/251) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (5/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (21/44) |
| 56% (5/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (41/87) |
| 85% (13/11) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (152/129) |
| 15% (13/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (152/23) |
| 21% (14/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (105/21) |