Jacob Grills vs Ken Cavrak Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Grills vs Cavrak analysis and find out who is favored!
Jacob Grills vs Ken Cavrak Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grills has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Cavrak has won 57.48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grills, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cavrak has won 48.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25.48% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grills has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cavrak has saved 63.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grills has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Cavrak winning 69.23% (W/L 9/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grills has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 152/ 115), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Cavrak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 19/ 23).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Grills winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Grills winning 2 and Cavrak winning 0. The last match between Grills and Cavrak was at the Australia F5 (Cairns), 19-09-2018, Second, Hard with Jacob Grills getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Grills and Cavrak have played a deciding set 0 times, with Grills winning 0 times and Cavrak 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Grills winning 0, and Cavrak 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grills has played against opponents with an average rank of while Cavrak has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grills has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cavrak has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grills has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cavrak has converted 52.94% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Grills 1 - 0 Cavrak
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Ret.
Rank
368
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
893
Rank
893
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (191-164)
Career Total W/L
49% (33-34)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,715
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Jacob Grills | Ken Cavrak |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:56:0 | 0:56:0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (28/41) | 64% (25/39) |
1st Serve Win% | 93% (26/28) | 44% (11/25) |
2nd Serve Win% | 62% (8/13) | 50% (7/14) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 54% (21/39) | 17% (7/41) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Jacob Grills
Player
Ken Cavrak
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Jacob Grills | Ken Cavrak |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jacob Grills Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jacob Grills
Player
Peter Bertran
44%
(
43 of
97)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
6
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
105
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Justin Butsch
Player
Jacob Grills
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jacob Grills
Player
Mousheg Hovhannisyan
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Jacob Grills
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Jacob Grills
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
93)
13
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jacob Grills
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zhe Li
Player
Jacob Grills
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Ken Cavrak Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Ken Cavrak
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
15
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ken Cavrak
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
14
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Ken Cavrak
Player
Daniel Litvinov
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 7-6(5) 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Andrea Fiorentini
Player
Ken Cavrak
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ken Cavrak
Player
Runyu Zhao
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 3-6 10-8 | H2H |
view more