Jacob Fearnley vs Tristan Boyer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Examining the second serve performance, one finds that over the past six months, Fearnley has secured 43.26% of points on their second serve. In comparison, Boyer has achieved a slightly higher percentage, with 45.51% of points won on their second serve. The correlation between this statistic and the prediction models is notably strong, lending significant weight to the analysis of each player's competitive edge.

Turning to return game statistics, Fearnley has consistently gained 43.63% of points from his opponent's second serve, while Boyer closely trails at 43.33%. However, when analyzing first serve returns, Boyer holds an advantage at 27.21% against Fearnley’s 24.52%. These metrics are critical in assessing who may be favored in this head-to-head clash.

Under pressure, Fearnley demonstrates resilience by saving 59.63% of breakpoints faced, whereas Boyer has managed to save 55.34%. This information is especially impactful for in-game wagering assessments. Additionally, recent tournament performances show that over the last year, Fearnley’s match-winning rate stands at a remarkable 75.81% (W/L 47/15), whereas Boyer has achieved a 59.72% winning percentage (W/L 43/29), painting a comprehensive picture of their head-to-head prospects.

On an individual basis, Fearnley’s strongest surface is indoor hard court, boasting an impressive 82% win rate (W/L 46/10), while his least favored surface is grass at 67% (W/L 10/5). Conversely, Boyer excels on clay with a 59% win rate (W/L 68/48) and struggles on grass, having no wins (W/L 0/1). Surface-specific performance is a vital factor when forecasting match outcomes.

Analyzing the player level competition, Fearnley has excelled in Challenger/ITF events exceeding $10K by winning 86.05% of his matches (W/L 37/6). Boyer, on the other hand, has won 63.64% of his matches in similar tournaments (W/L 35/20). It is crucial to note the level of their competition when comparing their match record statistics.

Opponent quality further distinguishes the players, as Fearnley has competed against players with an average rank of 211.53, in contrast to Boyer’s opponents who have an average rank of 239.49 over the past year. When matches extend to a deciding set, Fearnley demonstrates superior mental strength and stamina by winning 84% of these sets, compared to Boyer’s 59% deciding set win rate. Such stats prove instrumental in making real-time predictions and wagering decisions.

Vital for live betting, Fearnley’s breakpoint conversion stands at 26.32%, while Boyer exhibits a higher conversion percentage at 38.27%, indicating a potential advantage during tense breakpoint situations. Based on the amassed statistics, Fearnley appears to have the upper hand in this match due to his higher overall performance metrics, especially considering the quality of opponents and deciding set victories.