Prediction of Jacob Fearnley [74th] vs Raphael Collignon [83rd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
W L W W W W W W W LHead-2-Head: Fearnley 0 - 0 Collignon
| Fearnley | Stats | Collignon |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (14-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 68% (17-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 74 | Ranking | 83 |
| 73 | Highest Rank | 83 |
| 23 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 12 |
| 76% (87-28) | Career Total W/L | 67% (193-95) |
| $443,455 | Career Prize Money | $46,460 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Jacob Fearnley vs Raphael Collignon Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fearnley 0 - 0 Collignon
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fearnley has won 45.35% of points on their second serve, while Collignon has won 46.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fearnley, in recent form, has won 43.82% of their opponent's second serve points, while Collignon has won 47.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.04% and 24.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fearnley has saved 61.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Collignon has saved 56.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fearnley has won 73.91% of matches played (W/L 51/ 18), with Collignon winning 76.34% (W/L 71/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fearnley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 82% (W/L 46/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2). Collignon has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 109/ 38), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Fearnley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 86.05% of matches (W/L 37/ 6), where as Collignon has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 77.19% of matches (W/L 44/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fearnley has played against opponents with an average rank of 197.32 while Collignon has played against players with an average rank of 305.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fearnley has won 85% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Collignon has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fearnley has converted 26.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Collignon has converted 32.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Jacob Fearnley vs Raphael Collignon Best Odds For The Match
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jacob Fearnley
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Leo Borg
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
60 of
97)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tristan Boyer
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijs Boogaard
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
James Duckworth
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Raphael Collignon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Raphael Collignon
83%
(
67 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Guy Den Ouden
46%
(
39 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
47 of
76)
5
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
5
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
39%
(
18 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Jerome Kym
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Vitaliy Sachko
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Dalibor Svrcina
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Jan Choinski
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Khumoun Sultanov
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
78
|
6-2 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Federico Cina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Raphael Collignon
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
68 of
108)
12
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Fabio Fognini
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
55)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Fearnley vs Collignon?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Fearnley Vs Collignon is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76% (87/28) | Win/Loss | 67% (193/95) |
| 69% (185/83) | Sets Win/Loss | 64% (424/234) |
| 57% (1406/1071) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (3439/2716) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 538 | Aces Total | 949 |
| 0.38 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 459 | Total Double Faults | 895 |
| 1:24:25 | Average Match Time | 1:33:26 |
| 244.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 377.25 |
| 61% (4306/7067) | 1st Serve % | 64% (11420/17749) |
| 73% (3162/4306) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (8019/11420) |
| 51% (1407/2761) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3086/6329) |
| 44% (353/794) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (985/2132) |
| 42% (3071/7391) | Return Points Win % | 43% (8015/18684) |
| 77% (84/109) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (188/281) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 68% (19/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (42/72) |
| 78% (25/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (44/86) |
| 96% (73/70) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (189/167) |
| 4% (73/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (189/22) |
| 40% (42/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (99/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
