Jacob Brumm vs Ofek Shimanov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Brumm vs O. Shimanov

Jacob Brumm
USA
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
20
-
Height
-
686
C. Rank
857
607
Best Rank
822
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Ofek Shimanov
ISR
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
20
-
Height
-
686
C. Rank
857
607
Best Rank
822
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Brumm 1 - 0 Shimanov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jacob Brumm winning 2 and Ofek Shimanov winning 0. The last match between Jacob Brumm and Ofek Shimanov was at the M15 Kfar Saba, 03-08-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Jacob Brumm getting the victory 6-4 7-6(1).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Brumm | 1 |
| Shimanov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Kfar Saba(08-03-22)
Jacob Brumm
6
7
Ofek Shimanov
4
6
J. Brumm vs O. Shimanov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.14% (157-150) | Career Total W/L | 52.27% (46-42) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
J. Brumm vs O. Shimanov Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jacob Brumm has won 43.29% of points on their second serve, while Ofek Shimanov has won 33.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jacob Brumm, in recent form, has won 42.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ofek Shimanov has won 47.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.98% and 28.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jacob Brumm has saved 54.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ofek Shimanov has saved 54.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jacob Brumm has won 46.55% of matches played (W/L 27/31), with Ofek Shimanov winning 56.25% (W/L 9/7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jacob Brumm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 127/114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 6/14). Ofek Shimanov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 1/0), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 45/42).
- Player level: In the last year, Jacob Brumm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 45.65% of matches (W/L 21/25), where as Ofek Shimanov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 8/7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Jacob Brumm winning 1 times and Ofek Shimanov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Jacob Brumm winning 2 and Ofek Shimanov winning 0.
- The last match between Jacob Brumm and Ofek Shimanov was at the M15 Kfar Saba, 03-08-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Jacob Brumm getting the victory 6-4 7-6(1).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jacob Brumm has played against opponents with an average rank of 298.86 while Ofek Shimanov has played against players with an average rank of 231.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jacob Brumm has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ofek Shimanov has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jacob Brumm has converted 32.41% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ofek Shimanov has converted 50.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Jacob Brumm vs Ofek Shimanov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Brumm vs O. Shimanov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:42:0 | Average Match Time | 1:42:0 |
| 60% (43/72) | 1st Serve % | 67% (43/64) |
| 86% (37/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (29/43) |
| 48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (12/21) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 36% (23/64) | Return Points Win % | 29% (21/72) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Brumm 49%, Shimanov 38%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Brumm 51%, Shimanov 55%.
Break Points Saved %: Brumm 59%, Shimanov 57%.
J. Brumm Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 3-0 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 7-6(0) 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
O. Shimanov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||

J. Brumm vs O. Shimanov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.14% (157/150) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.27% (46/42) |
| 51.67% (355/332) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.45% (107/97) |
| 51.40% (3217/3042) | Games Win/Loss | 51.22% (1005/957) |
| 52.70% (127/114) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.72% (45/42) |
| 52.17% (24/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 30.00% (6/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 491 | Aces Total | 123 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 614 | Total Double Faults | 142 |
| 1:15:56 | Average Match Time | 1:19:52 |
| 335.46 | Average Opponent Rank | 382.73 |
| 59% (7810/13280) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2732/4653) |
| 65% (5106/7810) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1722/2732) |
| 49% (2654/5470) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (934/1921) |
| 43% (573/1330) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (232/582) |
| 40% (5340/13298) | Return Points Win % | 42% (2002/4786) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 33.33% (10/20) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.07% (147/130) | Futures W/L | 51.72% (45/42) |
| 52% (156/300) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (45/85) |
| 0% (0/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 64% (35/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (9/23) |
| 47% (34/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 86% (161/139) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (43/36) |
| 14% (161/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (43/6) |
| 12% (146/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (45/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 10:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 02:30 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 12:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 09:05 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
14:00
H2H 1-0
20:00
H2H 0-1
12:00
H2H 0-0
15:30
H2H 0-0
17:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal