Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jack Draper vs Daniel Evans Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Draper vs Evans analysis and find out who is favored!
Jack Draper vs Daniel Evans Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Draper has won 51.65% of points on his second serve, while Evans has won 51.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Draper, in recent form, has won 53.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Evans has won 48.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.29% and 24.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Draper has saved 67.24% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Evans has saved 60.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Draper has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 36/ 18), with Evans winning 32.43% (W/L 12/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Draper has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 76% (W/L 72/ 23), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 164/ 98), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 45/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Draper has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 68% of matches (W/L 17/ 8), where as Evans has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 29.41% of matches (W/L 5/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Draper winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Draper winning 2 and Evans winning 2. The last match between Draper and Evans was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 11-03-2023, Second, Hard with Jack Draper getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Draper and Evans have played a deciding set 0 times, with Draper winning 0 times and Evans 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Draper winning 0, and Evans 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Draper has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.43 while Evans has played against players with an average rank of 134.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Draper has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Evans has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Draper has converted 50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Evans has converted 29.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Draper 1 - 1 Evans
43
Rank
37
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
69
Rank
21
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
69% (200-90)
Career Total W/L
60% (550-370)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
23% (3-10)
$1,407,850
Career Prize Money
$4,736,130
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jack Draper | Daniel Evans |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 19 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:10 | 1:45:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (88/148) | 53% (64/121) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (57/88) | 69% (44/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (26/60) | 49% (28/57) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (6/16) | 27% (6/22) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (49/121) | 44% (65/148) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Jack Draper
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jack Draper
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jack Draper | Daniel Evans |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 23% (3/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (31/22) | 33% (11/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (276/223) | 45% (145/179) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (9/6) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.58 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 142 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:24 | 2:9:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 102.53 | 162.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (896/1539) | 57% (579/1015) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (677/896) | 71% (409/579) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (322/643) | 52% (225/436) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (71/140) | 30% (22/74) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (601/1533) | 34% (352/1039) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 69% (9/4) | 25% (2/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (10/16) | 25% (3/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 13% (8/1) |
Jack Draper Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Jack Draper
78%
(
75 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
18
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
60 of
75)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
24%
(
23 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
28 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Rudolf Molleker
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Vit Kopriva
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Jack Draper
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Jack Draper
66%
(
76 of
115)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
18
Aces
20
6
Double Faults
7
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
58 of
77)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Jack Draper
48%
(
41 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
39 of
82)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jack Draper
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Evans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Daniel Evans
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Daniel Evans
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Daniel Evans
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Eubanks
Player
Daniel Evans
71%
(
78 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
21
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
21%
(
20 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(3) 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
46 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
80
Total Points Won
84
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Daniel Evans
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
40 of
79)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Daniel Evans
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
12
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
93
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Daniel Evans
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Roman Safiullin
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Daniel Evans
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Draper Vs Evans Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jack Draper
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
