Ivana Sebestova vs Anna Mihalka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Ivana Sebestova has a higher recent success rate on second serve at 37.65% compared to Anna Mihalka's 31.40%. Can effective serve play determine match outcomes? Often, yes.
• In return games, Anna Mihalka has the advantage, winning 56.90% of second serve return points versus Ivana's 52.86%.
• Both players perform similarly on first serve returns, with Mihalka holding a slight edge at 36.24% over Sebestova's 34.16%.
• When under pressure, Mihalka has shown better resilience, saving 53.23% of breakpoints compared to Sebestova's 40.00%.
• Over the past year, Mihalka has won 66.67% of her matches, while Sebestova's win rate is lower at 46.81%.
• Surface preference could play a role: Sebestova excels on clay with a 53% win rate, while Mihalka is undefeated on I.hard with the same win rate.
• Examining tournament levels, Sebestova frequently competes in higher-level Challenger events, though with mixed results, whereas Mihalka has a higher win ratio in lower-tier Futures tournaments.
• Mihalka has faced tougher competition, with her opponents averaging a rank of 216.78, unlike Sebestova's 378.13, indicating Mihalka might have more experience against stronger opponents.
• If the match progresses to a deciding set, Sebestova has a 56% win rate in such situations, marginally better than Mihalka’s 50%.

Editorial Prediction (November 7, 2025, UTC):

As we anticipate the upcoming match, statistical analysis provides key insights into performance dynamics. Ivana Sebestova's stronger second serve efficacy contrasts with Anna Mihalka's superior return game aptitude. Both possess unique capabilities that shine in different match scenarios.

Mihalka's greater composure under pressure could prove crucial, often reflected through her remarkable break point savings and her notable victory rate over the past year. Further analysis reveals the impact of playing conditions, with Mihalka thriving on indoor hard-courts while Sebestova shows proficiency on clay surfaces.

The varying competition levels and match experience further differentiate the players. With Mihalka having contended against tougher-ranked opponents, her adaptability could be an asset. Meanwhile, Sebestova’s performance in clutch situations remains a potential tipping factor.

Considering these factors, Anna Mihalka's comprehensive performance in recent form, coupled with her experience against formidable opponents, makes her the more likely victor in this head-to-head encounter. However, Sebestova's ability to shift dynamics cannot be underestimated, promising an engaging match.