Prediction of Ivan Lendl vs Christoph Zipf Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
I. Lendl vs C. Zipf

Ivan Lendl

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

138

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Christoph Zipf

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

138

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Lendl 1 - 0 Zipf

They have played 2 sets in total, with Ivan Lendl winning 2 and Christoph Zipf winning 0. The last match between Ivan Lendl and Christoph Zipf was at the Frankfurt, 29-03-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Ivan Lendl getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Lendl	1
Zipf	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Frankfurt(03-29-82)

Stats

Ivan Lendl

Christoph Zipf

I. Lendl vs C. Zipf H2H Profile

I. Lendl	Stats	C. Zipf
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
81.57% (1071-242)	Career Total W/L	37.04% (30-51)
1	Indoor	0
94	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

I. Lendl vs C. Zipf Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ivan Lendl has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Christoph Zipf has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ivan Lendl, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Christoph Zipf has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Ivan Lendl has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Christoph Zipf has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Ivan Lendl has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Christoph Zipf winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Ivan Lendl has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 83% (W/L 379/77), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 14/6). Christoph Zipf has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 83% (W/L 1/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/12).
Player level: In the last year, Ivan Lendl has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Christoph Zipf has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ivan Lendl winning 1 times and Christoph Zipf being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ivan Lendl winning 2 and Christoph Zipf winning 0.
The last match between Ivan Lendl and Christoph Zipf was at the Frankfurt, 29-03-1982, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Ivan Lendl getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ivan Lendl has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Christoph Zipf has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ivan Lendl has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Christoph Zipf has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Ivan Lendl has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Christoph Zipf has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Ivan Lendl vs Christoph Zipf Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

I. Lendl vs C. Zipf H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

I. Lendl	Stats	C. Zipf
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	7
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

I. Lendl Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
U.S. Open - 29-08-1994
R2 Bernd KarbacherB. Karbacher	L	6-4 7-6(5) 1-0 ret.	Stats
R1 Neil BorwickN. Borwick	W	7-5 6-2 6-3	Stats
Schenectady - 22-08-1994
R2 Chuck AdamsC. Adams	L	7-6(5) 6-4	Stats
R1 Rodolphe GilbertR. Gilbert	W	0-6 6-2 6-3	Stats
New Haven - 15-08-1994
R3 Marc RossetM. Rosset	L	6-7(6) 6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Zipf Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bloemfontein CH - 23-11-1987
R2 Byron TalbotB. Talbot	L	4-6 7-6 6-3	Stats
Waiblingen CH - 11-05-1987
R3 Ivo WernerI. Werner	L	6-2 3-6 6-2	Stats
Tokyo Outdoor - 13-10-1986
R2 Matt AngerM. Anger	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Dortmund CH - 10-06-1985
R3 Markus GauM. Gau	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
R2 Axel KriegA. Krieg	W	6-7 7-6 6-2	Stats

View All

I. Lendl vs C. Zipf Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

I. Lendl	Stats	C. Zipf
81.57% (1071/242)	YTD Win/Loss	37.04% (30/51)
74.93% (2567/859)	Sets Win/Loss	41.54% (81/114)
59.43% (18911/12908)	Games Win/Loss	46.87% (892/1011)
83.11% (379/77)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (6/12)
81.03% (329/77)	Clay Win/Loss	36.54% (19/33)
82.22% (282/61)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.44% (4/5)
75.00% (81/27)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (1/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
336.66	Average Opponent Rank	581.65
81.92% (222/49)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
80.49% (165/40)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
62.07% (18/11)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
82.77% (658/137)	Main Tour W/L	34.88% (15/28)
62.50% (5/3)	Tour Finals W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	39.47% (15/23)
83% (757/917)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	36% (29/80)
80% (303/381)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
43% (40/92)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
66% (184/280)	Deciding Set Win %	35% (12/34)
93% (991/925)	1st Set Won, Won Match	63% (32/20)
7% (991/65)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	38% (32/12)
43% (314/135)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (49/10)