I. Gakhov
To Win
S. P. Contri
To Win
Ivan Gakhov vs Alexander Shevchenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L L W W
Form
L L L W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Gakhov 1 - 1 Shevchenko
They have played 5 sets in total, with Gakhov winning 3 and Shevchenko winning 2. The last match between Gakhov and Shevchenko was at the M15 Shymkent, 04-06-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Ivan Gakhov getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ivan Gakhov | 1 |
| Alexander Shevchenko | 1 |
M15 Shymkent(04-06-2021)
7
5
6
4
| Gakhov | Stats | Shevchenko |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (15-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 33% (8-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 310 | Ranking | 92 |
| 142 | Highest Rank | 45 |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 16 | Titles | 7 |
| 61% (510-330) | Career Total W/L | 58% (264-189) |
| $59,930 | Career Prize Money | $1,007,045 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
25 Apr 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gakhov VS Shevchenko H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(3) 6-0 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Ivan Gakhov
43%
(
36 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Gakhov VS Shevchenko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 25 | Games Won | 25 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:12:30 | Average Match Time | 2:12:30 |
| 64% (110/173) | 1st Serve % | 44% (66/150) |
| 67% (74/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (52/66) |
| 52% (33/63) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (45/84) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 22% (4/18) |
| 35% (53/150) | Return Points Win % | 38% (66/173) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ivan Gakhov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Thomas Deschamps
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Daniel Salazar Martinez
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
85%
(
58 of
68)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Ivan Gakhov
70%
(
82 of
117)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
40 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
91)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 6-7(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Ivan Gakhov
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alejo Sanchez Quilez
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Diego Fernandez Flores
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
51)
53
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alvaro Jimenez
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
12
Total Points Won
9
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Ivan Gakhov
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Ivan Gakhov
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Denis Yevseyev
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
92)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexander Shevchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Flavio Cobolli
64%
(
89 of
138)
1st Serve %
45%
(
48 of
106)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
4
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
46%
(
63 of
138)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
123
Total Points Won
121
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Rinky Hijikata
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Tristan Boyer
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (510/330) | Win/Loss | 58% (264/189) |
| 58% (1142/825) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (603/463) |
| 53% (9853/8793) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5294/4799) |
| 54% (50/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (51/48) |
| 63% (441/259) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (178/111) |
| 40% (19/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (34/26) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2457 | Aces Total | 1279 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1842 | Total Double Faults | 1011 |
| 1:21:27 | Average Match Time | 1:32:40 |
| 497.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 384.67 |
| 61% (28196/46234) | 1st Serve % | 59% (17746/30037) |
| 68% (19289/28196) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11816/17746) |
| 50% (9011/18038) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6177/12290) |
| 42% (2080/4971) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1402/3137) |
| 41% (19363/47286) | Return Points Win % | 42% (12403/29870) |
| 0% (0/4) | Slam W/L | 23% (3/10) |
| 75% (3/1) | Masters W/L | 45% (15/18) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 27% (6/16) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (40/46) |
| 51% (137/133) | Challenger W/L | 60% (74/50) |
| 67% (364/176) | Futures W/L | 68% (131/63) |
| 61% (505/832) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (256/436) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 36% (5/14) |
| 55% (146/265) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (80/146) |
| 57% (165/290) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (72/144) |
| 87% (483/421) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (267/225) |
| 13% (483/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (267/41) |
| 24% (357/87) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (186/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
