Iva Primorac vs Harmony Tan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 11:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Primorac vs H. Tan

CRO
0
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Primorac 0 - 1 Tan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Iva Primorac winning 1 and Harmony Tan winning 2. The last match between Harmony Tan and Iva Primorac was at the W100 Wrexham, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Harmony Tan getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Primorac | 0 |
| Tan | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W100 Wrexham(10-22-25)
I. Primorac vs H. Tan H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $638,698 |
| 58.70% (317-223) | Career Total W/L | 55.35% (388-313) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 11 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Primorac vs H. Tan Match Preview:
- Second Serve: Over the last six months, Iva Primorac has shown a slight edge, winning 40.88% of points on her second serve compared to Harmony Tan's 40.22%.
- Return Game: Iva Primorac has the upper hand in return games recently, capturing 52.66% of opponent's second serve points versus 50.47% by Harmony Tan.
- First Serve Returns: Primorac also outperforms in first serve returns, with a win rate of 33.43%, ahead of Tan's 31.88%.
- Pressure Performance: How do these athletes handle crucial moments? Harmony Tan shines with a 50.71% breakpoint saving rate, eclipsing Primorac's 43.59%.
- Match Success: Over the past year, Tan has maintained a higher match win percentage (61.33%) than Primorac (51.02%).
- Best Surface: Grass enhances Tan's play the most, boasting a 63% win rate. In contrast, Primorac thrives on clay with an identical 63% win rate.
- Event Experience: Tan impresses at the Challengers/ITF > $10K level, triumphing in 63.89% of matches, whereas Primorac wins 51.02% at the same level.
- Opponent Quality: Last year, Tan faced tougher opponents, averaging a rank of 341.99, compared to Primorac's 427.55.
- Deciding Sets: Primorac edges out in deciders, winning 50% compared to Tan's 44% over the last year.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
As we delve into their recent performances, both players have demonstrated certain strengths. Iva Primorac displays superior skills on the second serve and return game points, showcasing an ability to gain a slight edge in these critical areas.
Harmony Tan, however, excels in navigating pressure situations, boasting an impressive ability to save breakpoints. Her record over the last year also illustrates a higher match win percentage and experience against stronger competition.
Surface preferences and adaptability are also telling. Tan's best results are on grass, while Primorac performs best on clay, which can influence outcomes depending on the playing surface.
In conclusion, evaluating these factors, Harmony Tan appears to have a slight advantage and is most likely to win the upcoming match, given her superior experience with higher-ranked opponents and overall match success.
Iva Primorac vs Harmony Tan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Primorac vs H. Tan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 15 | Games Won | 17 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:42:18 | Average Match Time | 2:42:18 |
| 66% (75/113) | 1st Serve % | 60% (61/101) |
| 60% (45/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (38/61) |
| 39% (15/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (21/40) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (6/16) |
| 42% (42/101) | Return Points Win % | 47% (53/113) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Primorac Recent Matches Played
H. Tan Recent Matches Played

I. Primorac vs H. Tan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.70% (317/223) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.35% (388/313) |
| 57.41% (701/520) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.29% (867/701) |
| 53.51% (5924/5147) | Games Win/Loss | 52.62% (7272/6549) |
| 54.55% (24/20) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.47% (131/101) |
| 60.26% (235/155) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.39% (130/128) |
| 54.72% (58/48) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.67% (108/73) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 63.33% (19/11) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 662 | Aces Total | 1097 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1521 | Total Double Faults | 1212 |
| 1:1:39 | Average Match Time | 1:13:31 |
| 519.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 488.53 |
| 61% (13001/21220) | 1st Serve % | 58% (21055/36298) |
| 61% (7982/13001) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (13207/21055) |
| 44% (3598/8219) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6955/15243) |
| 49% (1343/2714) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2253/4512) |
| 47% (9913/21189) | Return Points Win % | 46% (16390/35283) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 38.89% (14/22) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 42.62% (26/35) |
| 55.88% (152/120) | Challenger W/L | 55.61% (248/198) |
| 61.57% (165/103) | Futures W/L | 64.86% (96/52) |
| 59% (314/529) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (381/675) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 10% (1/10) |
| 47% (52/111) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (61/118) |
| 54% (81/150) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (85/174) |
| 87% (316/276) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (392/338) |
| 12% (316/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (392/52) |
| 18% (224/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (308/49) |