Iva Jovic vs Maria Camila Osorio Serrano Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Sep at 12:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Jovic vs M. Camila Osorio Serrano

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

COL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Jovic 1 - 0 Serrano
They have played 2 sets in total, with Iva Jovic winning 2 and Maria Camila Osorio Serrano winning 0. The last match between Iva Jovic and Maria Camila Osorio Serrano was at the Guadalajara Open Akron - Guadalajara, 11-09-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Iva Jovic getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Jovic | 1 |
| Serrano | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Guadalajara Open Akron - Guadalajara(09-11-25)
I. Jovic vs M. C. O. Serrano H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $959,230 | Career Prize Money | $1,923,416 |
| 72.07% (80-31) | Career Total W/L | 61.70% (232-144) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 6 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 58.33% (14-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.50% (21-19) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
I. Jovic vs M. C. O. Serrano Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Serrano currently has a 37.16% win rate on second serve points compared to Jovic's 38.24%. Is this a significant advantage? Slightly, as it suggests Jovic has a minor edge in sustaining rallies after a second serve.
- Return Game: Serrano excels in winning points on their opponent's second serve at 55.84%, compared to Jovic's 47.86%. Could this impact the match outcome? Yes, suggests Serrano is better at exploiting weaker serves.
- Breakpoint Resilience: Serrano has saved 48.86% of breakpoints, slightly outpacing Jovic's 48.1%. Does this give Serrano an advantage during critical points? Marginally, indicating steadier nerve under pressure.
- Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Serrano has won 55.56% of matches, while Jovic boasts a 74.19% win rate. Can historical performance predict the winner? Likely, Jovic shows a stronger win record.
- Surface Preference: Serrano performs best on clay with a 70% win rate, whereas Jovic excels on grass, winning 89% of matches. Does this influence overall performance? Depends on the surface of the match.
- Event Level: Serrano has primarily competed on the Main tour with a 65% win rate, while Jovic's 82.5% win rate is largely in lower-level events. Does opponent quality matter? Yes, Serrano has faced tougher competition.
- Opponent Quality: Serrano’s average opponent rank is 113.64, versus Jovic's 228.16. Does this affect prediction? Yes, Serrano’s stronger competition may indicate better preparedness at higher levels.
- Deciding Sets: Jovic tends to perform better in deciding sets with an 80% win rate compared to Serrano's 50%. Could stamina decide the match? Potentially, gives Jovic an upper hand in tight matches.
- Break Point Conversion: Serrano has a higher breakpoint conversion rate at 42.21%, in contrast to Jovic's 33.99%. Is this a critical indicator? Yes, it suggests Serrano capitalizes more effectively on scoring opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (September 12, 2025, UTC):
Serrano and Jovic's upcoming match presents an intriguing tactical battle, as their strengths play out in contrast. Serrano's superior performance in return games and breakpoint conversions suggests an ability to seize the initiative, particularly against weaker serves. This strength is bolstered by a history of competing against stronger opponents, indicating readiness for high-level matches.
In contrast, Jovic maintains a higher overall win rate, largely attributed to dominance in lower-tier events. Nonetheless, Jovic's exceptional performance on grass and prowess in deciding sets denote strategic advantages and stamina. These factors may favor Jovic if the match extends to intense rallies or tiebreak scenarios.
While Jovic's recent form cannot be overlooked, the quality of competition faced by Serrano, along with sharper breakpoint abilities, presents a compelling argument. The upcoming match is likely to be closely contested, but considering all factors, Serrano appears to have a slight edge due to tactical nuance and resilience under pressure.
In conclusion, based on current analysis and performance indicators, Serrano is projected to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Iva Jovic vs Maria Camila Osorio Serrano Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Jovic vs M. C. O. Serrano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:29:33 | Average Match Time | 1:29:33 |
| 71% (46/65) | 1st Serve % | 55% (35/64) |
| 59% (27/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 42% (8/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
| 58% (37/64) | Return Points Win % | 46% (30/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Jovic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | W | 6-0 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R3 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
M. C. O. Serrano Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Rubber 2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 3-0 ret. | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||

I. Jovic vs M. C. O. Serrano Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.07% (80/31) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.70% (232/144) |
| 67.19% (170/83) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.07% (500/361) |
| 57.04% (1329/1001) | Games Win/Loss | 52.65% (4207/3784) |
| 70.51% (55/23) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.85% (84/72) |
| 73.91% (17/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 70.22% (125/53) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.71% (11/6) |
| 88.89% (8/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 48.00% (12/13) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 140 | Aces Total | 431 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.42 |
| 214 | Total Double Faults | 1655 |
| 1:42:24 | Average Match Time | 1:31:28 |
| 283.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 339.6 |
| 61% (4409/7188) | 1st Serve % | 64% (15716/24448) |
| 63% (2767/4409) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9481/15716) |
| 51% (1404/2779) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (3740/8722) |
| 50% (484/962) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1611/3305) |
| 48% (3509/7311) | Return Points Win % | 48% (11631/24310) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Slam W/L | 47.73% (21/23) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Masters W/L | 48.89% (22/23) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 73.68% (14/5) |
| 77.78% (7/2) | Main Tour W/L | 62.02% (80/49) |
| 77.78% (56/16) | Challenger W/L | 66.36% (73/37) |
| 80.00% (4/1) | Futures W/L | 75.86% (22/7) |
| 72% (79/109) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (226/365) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (4/6) |
| 43% (9/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (49/86) |
| 67% (22/33) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (72/110) |
| 94% (77/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (213/190) |
| 6% (77/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (213/22) |
| 24% (34/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (163/40) |