Isis Louise Van Den Broek vs Elena Korokozidi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
I. Louise Van Den Broek vs E. Korokozidi

Isis Louise Van Den Broek

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

539

C. Rank

624

513

Best Rank

623

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.6K

Career Money

Plays

Elena Korokozidi

RUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

539

C. Rank

624

513

Best Rank

623

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$2.6K

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Broek 1 - 0 Korokozidi

They have played 2 sets in total, with Isis Louise Van Den Broek winning 2 and Elena Korokozidi winning 0. The last match between Isis Louise Van Den Broek and Elena Korokozidi was at the W15 Manacor, 19-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Isis Louise Van Den Broek getting the victory 7-5 6-0.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Broek	1
Korokozidi	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) W15 Manacor(02-19-25)

Stats

Isis Louise Van Den Broek

Elena Korokozidi

I. L. V. D. Broek vs E. Korokozidi H2H Profile

I. L. V. D. Broek	Stats	E. Korokozidi
$2,585	Career Prize Money	$0
64.55% (71-39)	Career Total W/L	55.70% (88-70)
1	Hard	0
1	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

I. L. V. D. Broek vs E. Korokozidi Match Preview:

Excellence in Second Serve: A comparison of the recent performances (over the past 6 months) reveals that Korokozidi has achieved a commendable 43.71% in second serve points won, while Broek has secured 43.19%. Remarkably, this statistic exhibits a strong correlation with the accuracy of match predictions.
Return Game Prowess: Analyzing return game statistics for the recent period, Korokozidi emerges as the superior player, having won 58.64% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Broek's performance stands at 56.02%. In terms of first serve returns, the figures are 39.66% and 44.98%, respectively. Undoubtedly, these numbers significantly influence the favorable outcome in the head-to-head matchup.
Thriving Under Pressure: When it comes to facing critical situations, Korokozidi has demonstrated resilience by saving 45.31% of breakpoints in their recent performances. In contrast, Broek has exhibited an even higher rate of effectiveness, succeeding in saving 52.73% of breakpoints. This statistical aspect holds considerable value in predicting the outcome of in-game betting endeavors.
Comprehensive Performance Overview: Taking into account the past year's records, Korokozidi has proven their mettle by securing victory in 58.7% of matches played (with a win-loss record of 27-19). Similarly, Broek has achieved success in 57.14% of matches (16-12). These figures provide an all-encompassing prediction overview for the head-to-head clash.
The Optimal Playing Surface: Analyzing the players' career win percentages on various surfaces, it becomes evident that Korokozidi excels on hard courts, winning 63% of matches (5-3). Conversely, their performance falters on indoor hard courts, with a win percentage of 45% (5-6). On the other hand, Broek showcases their best career win percentage on hard courts, claiming victory in 65% of matches (11-6). However, they struggle on grass, having failed to secure a single win (0-1).
A Player's Level: Within the past year, Korokozidi has predominantly competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money surpassing $10,000. Impressively, they have emerged triumphant in 56.25% of matches (18-14). In contrast, Broek has primarily participated in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments with prize money amounting to $10,000, boasting a success rate of 66.67% (14-7). When scrutinizing players' statistics to predict the favorite, it is essential to consider the relative level of the events they have been engaged in.
Opponent Quality Assessment: Over the preceding 12 months, Korokozidi has faced opponents with an average ranking of 315.46, while Broek has encountered adversaries with an average ranking of 373.21.
Nail-Biting Deciding Set Performances: For those interested in live predictions and betting, it is worth noting that Korokozidi has triumphed in an impressive 69% of deciding sets within the last 12 months. In contrast, Broek's record stands at 50% across all matches on the tour. These figures bear significant relevance when contemplating the potential outcome of a match that progresses to a decisive set.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: Assessing past player performances is undoubtedly invaluable in predicting tennis matches. However, once an ongoing event is underway, it is equally important to factor in the current event statistics to gauge players' current form. For detailed insights, please refer to the section below (assuming the players have participated in the current event). It is imperative to consider that certain players may excel disproportionately at specific events, hence necessitating their impact on outcome selection.
Break Point Conversion Rate: Recent form analysis highlights Korokozidi's prowess in converting 48.85% of breakpoint opportunities, while Broek has capitalized on 54.17% of their chances to break their opponents' serves. This enlightening statistic plays a significant role in providing in-game live betting tips whenever either player is presented with a pivotal breakpoint.
For those intrigued by models that offer accurate predictions in tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it is pertinent to note that this resource is intended for data enthusiasts exclusively.

Isis Louise Van Den Broek vs Elena Korokozidi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

I. L. V. D. Broek vs E. Korokozidi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

I. L. V. D. Broek	Stats	E. Korokozidi
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	5
1	Aces (Total)	1
0	Total Double Faults	4
1:29:28	Average Match Time	1:29:28
75% (40/53)	1st Serve %	51% (30/59)
68% (27/40)	1st Serve Win %	53% (16/30)
69% (9/13)	2nd Serve Win %	41% (12/29)
71% (5/7)	Break Pts Won %	33% (1/3)
53% (31/59)	Return Points Win %	32% (17/53)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

I. L. V. D. Broek Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W35 Faro - 03-11-2025
R2 Angela Fita BoludaA. Fita	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
R1 Amelie Van ImpeA. Van	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Q3 Daria YesypchukD. Yesypchuk	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Q1 Mariia NozdrachovaM. Nozdrachova	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
W35 Loule - 27-10-2025
R1 Angelina VoloshchukA. Voloshchuk	L	6-3 3-6 6-2	Stats

View All

E. Korokozidi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W15 Heraklion - 24-11-2025
F Sapfo SakellaridiS. Sakellaridi	L	1-6 6-4 6-3	Stats
SF Lucia Cortez LlorcaL. Cortez	W	3-6 7-5 6-0	Stats
QF Sara DolsS. Dols	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
R2 Patricia Georgiana GoinaP. Georgiana	W	6-2 7-6(2)	Stats
R1 Maryna KolbM. Kolb	W	6-0 6-4	Stats

View All

I. L. V. D. Broek vs E. Korokozidi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

I. L. V. D. Broek	Stats	E. Korokozidi
64.55% (71/39)	YTD Win/Loss	55.70% (88/70)
61.18% (156/99)	Sets Win/Loss	53.89% (201/172)
54.71% (1273/1054)	Games Win/Loss	51.74% (1812/1690)
64.71% (22/12)	Hard Win/Loss	50.00% (7/7)
66.20% (47/24)	Clay Win/Loss	57.58% (76/56)
0.00% (0/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	41.67% (5/7)
50.00% (2/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.05	Aces Per Game	0.05
53	Aces Total	84
0.34	Double Faults Per Game	0.4
382	Total Double Faults	686
1:37:56	Average Match Time	1:26:43
448.75	Average Opponent Rank	418.21
68% (4703/6872)	1st Serve %	57% (5226/9226)
58% (2718/4703)	1st Serve Win %	57% (2963/5226)
45% (979/2169)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (1724/4000)
54% (491/911)	Break Points Won % (Total)	51% (678/1326)
49% (3330/6782)	Return Points Win %	50% (4627/9262)
50.00% (2/2)	Main Tour W/L	0% (0/0)
59.46% (22/15)	Challenger W/L	49.32% (36/37)
68.12% (47/22)	Futures W/L	61.18% (52/33)
65% (71/110)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (86/156)
60% (9/15)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	52% (12/23)
60% (21/35)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (32/59)
90% (71/64)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (86/70)
10% (71/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (86/16)
18% (39/7)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	25% (72/18)