Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Isabella Kruger vs Talia Gibson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kruger vs Gibson analysis and find out who is favored!
Isabella Kruger vs Talia Gibson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kruger has won 43.85% of points on his second serve, while Gibson has won 45.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kruger, in recent form, has won 51.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gibson has won 56.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.9% and 37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kruger has saved 63.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gibson has saved 61.34% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kruger has won 56.25% of matches played (W/L 9/ 7), with Gibson winning 61.54% (W/L 48/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kruger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36). Gibson has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 93/ 50), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Kruger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 9/ 7), where as Gibson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.16% of matches (W/L 46/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kruger winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kruger winning 2 and Gibson winning 1. The last match between Kruger and Gibson was at the W25 Canberra, 17-02-2022, Second, Hard with Isabella Kruger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kruger and Gibson have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kruger winning 1 times and Gibson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kruger winning 0, and Gibson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kruger has played against opponents with an average rank of 271.25 while Gibson has played against players with an average rank of 265.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kruger has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gibson has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kruger has converted 48.48% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gibson has converted 44.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kruger 1 - 0 Gibson
793
Rank
330
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
188
Rank
184
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
61% (78-49)
Career Total W/L
63% (105-63)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$75,300
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Isabella Kruger | Talia Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:0 | 1:45:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (44/74) | 58% (43/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (33/44) | 63% (27/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (12/30) | 52% (16/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (31/74) | 39% (29/74) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Isabella Kruger
Player
Talia Gibson
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Isabella Kruger | Talia Gibson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 52% (29/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (48/51) | 51% (264/249) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 33% (3/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.48 |
| Aces Total | 13 | 121 |
| DFs per game | 0.73 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:12 | 1:45:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 172 | 205.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (190/320) | 65% (1117/1727) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (124/190) | 67% (744/1117) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (57/130) | 44% (268/610) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (16/33) | 42% (82/196) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (145/336) | 43% (723/1693) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 53% (10/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (3/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 44% (4/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 71% (14/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 29% (14/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Isabella Kruger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jaeda Daniel
Player
Isabella Kruger
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Maddalena Giordano
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Pigossi
Player
Isabella Kruger
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Ekaterina Shalimova
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
42%
(
38 of
90)
4
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
44 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Indy De Vroome
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
12
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
18 of
21)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
44
Total Points Won
42
|
3-6 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiia Gureva
Player
Isabella Kruger
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Daniela Seguel
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Min Liu
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eudice Wong Chong
Player
Isabella Kruger
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
100
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Teresa Franco Dias
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Talia Gibson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Marino
Player
Talia Gibson
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Talia Gibson
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Talia Gibson
66%
(
78 of
118)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
6
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
51 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
98
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ya-Hsuan Lee
Player
Talia Gibson
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
67)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Mia Hasegawa
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Talia Gibson
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Timea Babos
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Jessika Ponchet
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Valeria Savinykh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
15
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kruger Vs Gibson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
