Ioannis Xilas vs Oliver Tarvet Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recently, Xilas has been slightly better on their second serve, securing 43.01% of points compared to Tarvet's 40.94%. Could this slight advantage be a deciding factor in the match?
• Return Game Efficiency: Xilas has shown superior return stats, winning 51.14% of opponents' second serve points and 28.28% of first serve returns. Tarvet trails behind with 41.76% and 25.87%, respectively.
• Under Pressure: Xilas demonstrates resilience under pressure by saving 48.53% of breakpoints, edging out Tarvet's 44.87% in recent form.
• Performance Overview: Tarvet holds a superior match-winning record over the last year at 86.36%, compared to Xilas' 58.33%.
• Surface Suitability: Tarvet excels on hard courts with an 83% win rate, while Xilas performs best on clay with a 64% win rate. Could the surface of the upcoming match play to Tarvet's advantage?
• Player Level: Tarvet has been more successful at the ITF $10K level, winning 87.5% of their matches, compared to Xilas' 61.9% success rate.
• Opponent Quality: Over the past year, Tarvet has faced slightly stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 381.68, whereas Xilas faced opponents with an average rank of 434.29.
• Deciding Set Performance: In matches stretching to a deciding set, Tarvet holds a 50% win rate in the last year, whereas Xilas has only a 25% success rate.
• Break Point Conversion: Xilas has been more effective in recent breakpoint conversions, with a rate of 41.43%, clearly surpassing Tarvet's 28.89%.
• Event-Based Performance: While reviewing stats from past events can be instrumental, it’s critical to consider current form and results from the ongoing tournament, if applicable.

Editorial Prediction (August 13, 2025, UTC):

In the upcoming tennis match, both players present a compelling case for potential victories based on recent performance metrics.

Xilas has shown notable proficiency in their return game and breakpoint conversion, which could tip the match in their favor during crucial moments. Their ability to perform well under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints adds another layer of confidence.

On the other hand, Tarvet's overall match-winning record and success on hard surfaces showcase their consistency and adaptability. Additionally, their slightly better experience against higher-ranked opponents and stronger deciding set performance can provide a psychological edge.

Considering the analysis of strengths and weaknesses, Tarvet appears to be the more likely victor in this match, provided they can maintain their composure and leverage their strengths effectively.