Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Yannick Maden Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Maden analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Yannick Maden Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 48.11% of points on his second serve, while Maden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 44.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Maden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.46% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 61.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 57.63% of matches played (W/L 34/ 25), with Maden winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Maden has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 196/ 93), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 18), where as Maden has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Marchenko winning 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 4 and Maden winning 5. The last match between Marchenko and Maden was at the French Open - Paris, 21-09-2020, Q1 round, Clay with Yannick Maden getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marchenko and Maden have played a deciding set 3 times, with Marchenko winning 1 times and Maden 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marchenko winning 0, and Maden 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.83 while Maden has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marchenko 1 - 2 Maden
240
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
1
Indoor0
0
Grass1
784
Rank
96
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
57% (598-445)
Career Total W/L
61% (339-219)
27% (4-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,217,273
Career Prize Money
$381,245
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Yannick Maden |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 5 |
| Games Won | 38 | 45 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 19 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:36 | 2:7:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (129/261) | 61% (152/251) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (87/129) | 70% (107/152) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (64/132) | 48% (48/99) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (10/25) | 52% (12/23) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (96/256) | 43% (117/273) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Yannick Maden
Player
Illya Marchenko
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannick Maden
48%
(
46 of
95)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
27 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Yannick Maden
Player
Illya Marchenko
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Yannick Maden |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (12/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (169/194) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 22% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.44 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 52 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:59 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 268.13 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (689/1219) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (474/689) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (255/530) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (35/91) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (409/1150) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 27% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (4/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Illya Marchenko
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
15
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Illya Marchenko
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Alex Bolt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Illya Marchenko
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Yannick Maden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Yannick Maden
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Moraing
Player
Yannick Maden
40%
(
10 of
25)
1st Serve %
64%
(
21 of
33)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
10 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yannick Maden
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Viola
Player
Yannick Maden
75%
(
76 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Yannick Maden
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Yannick Maden
77%
(
59 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Forejtek
Player
Yannick Maden
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
13
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Hoang
Player
Yannick Maden
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Maden Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Illya Marchenko
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
