Prediction of Illya Marchenko vs Genia Gamazov Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Marchenko vs G. Gamazov

Illya Marchenko
 UKR
l
l
l
w
w
l
l
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
38
Age
34
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
-
641
C. Rank
Ret.
49
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.2M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Genia Gamazov
 ISR
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
38
Age
34
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
-
641
C. Rank
Ret.
49
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.2M
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Marchenko 1 - 0 Gamazov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Illya Marchenko winning 2 and Genia Gamazov winning 0. The last match between Illya Marchenko and Genia Gamazov was at the Ramat Hasharon Challenger, 04-05-2009, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Illya Marchenko getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Marchenko | 1 | 
| Gamazov | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Ramat Hasharon Challenger(05-04-09)
Illya Marchenko
6
6
Genia Gamazov
2
4
I. Marchenko vs G. Gamazov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,217,273 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 57.00% (607-458) | Career Total W/L | 0.00% (0-7) | 
| 1 | Hard | 0 | 
| 12 | Titles | 0 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
I. Marchenko vs G. Gamazov Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Illya Marchenko has won 50.00% of points on their second serve, while Genia Gamazov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Illya Marchenko, in recent form, has won 56.86% of their opponent's second serve points, while Genia Gamazov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.26% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Illya Marchenko has saved 75.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Genia Gamazov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Illya Marchenko has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 5/2), with Genia Gamazov winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Illya Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/138), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/85). Genia Gamazov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 0/1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Illya Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 2/2), where as Genia Gamazov has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Illya Marchenko winning 1 times and Genia Gamazov being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Illya Marchenko winning 2 and Genia Gamazov winning 0.
- The last match between Illya Marchenko and Genia Gamazov was at the Ramat Hasharon Challenger, 04-05-2009, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Illya Marchenko getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Illya Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 416.71 while Genia Gamazov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Illya Marchenko has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Genia Gamazov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Illya Marchenko has converted 11.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Genia Gamazov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Illya Marchenko vs Genia Gamazov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Marchenko vs G. Gamazov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 6 | 
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Marchenko 47%, Gamazov 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Marchenko 59%, Gamazov 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Marchenko 78%, Gamazov 0%.
I. Marchenko Recent Matches Played
G. Gamazov Recent Matches Played

I. Marchenko vs G. Gamazov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.00% (607/458) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/7) | 
| 55.96% (1428/1124) | Sets Win/Loss | 12.50% (2/14) | 
| 51.94% (12880/11917) | Games Win/Loss | 34.04% (48/93) | 
| 58.45% (256/182) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/6) | 
| 42.57% (63/85) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 62.78% (253/150) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 46.05% (35/41) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0 | 
| 4034 | Aces Total | 0 | 
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 | 
| 2979 | Total Double Faults | 0 | 
| 1:14:14 | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 564.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 448.57 | 
| 58% (34524/60040) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 72% (24963/34524) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50% (12840/25507) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 41% (2333/5672) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 
| 38% (23071/60087) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50.57% (44/43) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 30.56% (11/25) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 56.67% (17/13) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50.72% (106/103) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 59.71% (369/249) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 71.43% (60/24) | Futures W/L | 0.00% (0/6) | 
| 57% (573/1005) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/7) | 
| 49% (23/47) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 50% (211/423) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 
| 47% (173/370) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 83% (598/496) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) | 
| 17% (598/102) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 24% (466/110) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (6/0) | 
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
2.93
W2
1.34
12:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.53
W2
2.33
12:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.85
W2
1.85
04:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
2.375
W2
1.58
05:30 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
2.15
W2
1.7
01:00 PM 31/10/25
PredictionW1
1.43
W2
2.6
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
31 Oct 2025
Yulia Putintseva vs Viktorija Golubic Prediction – WTA Jiangxi Open – 31st October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Sara Bejlek vs Julia Riera Prediction – WTA Cali Open – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Francisco Cerundolo vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Francisco Cerundolo vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
30 Oct 2025
Jazmin Ortenzi vs Julia Grabher Prediction – WTA Cali Open – 30th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
22:30
H2H 14-7
H2H 5-6
H2H 6-4
21:00
H2H 1-6
Tennis Events This Week
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris
France
Bratislava 2 Challenger
Slovakia
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
Monastir Challenger
Tunisia
Seoul Challenger
Korea, Rep.
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Hua Hin
Thailand
M15 Malta
Malta
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Selva Gardena
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Szabolcsveresmart
Hungary
M15 Trois-Rivieres
Canada
M15 Yanagawa City
Japan
M25 Glasgow
Great Britain
M25 Harlingen
United States
M25 Lajeado
Brazil
M25 Sintra
Portugal












