Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Illya Marchenko vs Gabriel Decamps Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marchenko vs Decamps analysis and find out who is favored!
Illya Marchenko vs Gabriel Decamps Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marchenko has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Decamps has won 49.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marchenko, in recent form, has won 46.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Decamps has won 55.69%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.56% and 34.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marchenko has saved 64.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Decamps has saved 56.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marchenko has won 59.32% of matches played (W/L 35/ 24), with Decamps winning 64.71% (W/L 33/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84). Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Marchenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.83% of matches (W/L 30/ 17), where as Decamps has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.77% of matches (W/L 30/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marchenko winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Marchenko winning 4 and Decamps winning 0. The last match between Marchenko and Decamps was at the Shymkent 2 Challenger, 18-05-2022, Second, Clay with Illya Marchenko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:55:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marchenko and Decamps have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marchenko winning 0 times and Decamps 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marchenko winning 0, and Decamps 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marchenko has played against opponents with an average rank of 310.08 while Decamps has played against players with an average rank of 218.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marchenko has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Decamps has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marchenko has converted 41.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Decamps has converted 44.02% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marchenko 2 - 0 Decamps
239
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
659
Rank
262
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
57% (598-443)
Career Total W/L
63% (160-92)
31% (4-9)
YTD W/L
71% (17-7)
$1,217,273
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:55:8 | 0:55:8 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (56/81) | 52% (47/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (47/56) | 57% (27/47) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (16/25) | 35% (15/43) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 69% (9/13) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (48/90) | 22% (18/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Illya Marchenko
Player
Gabriel Decamps
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Gabriel Decamps
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Illya Marchenko | Gabriel Decamps |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 31% (4/9) | 71% (17/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 35% (11/20) | 69% (36/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (151/166) | 57% (278/209) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 74% (14/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 65 | 56 |
| DFs per game | 0.3 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:24:50 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 248.92 | 216.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (606/1081) | 61% (784/1278) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (411/606) | 71% (555/784) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (234/475) | 50% (245/494) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (33/84) | 45% (74/166) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (366/1008) | 44% (597/1367) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (17/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 31% (4/13) | 73% (16/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Alex Bolt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Illya Marchenko
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Brandon Holt
49%
(
55 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
127)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
57 of
89)
51%
(
29 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriel Decamps Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Antonio Nunez
Player
Gabriel Decamps
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Felipe Pagnacco
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Thiago Cigarran
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Demetris Azoides
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
63 of
116)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Gabriel Decamps
53%
(
10 of
19)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
25
Total Points Won
9
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
11 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
46%
(
24 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Gabriel Decamps
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Melero Kretzer
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Louis Dussin
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Marchenko Vs Decamps Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
