Prediction of Ilie Nastase vs Mike Cahill Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
I. Nastase vs M. Cahill

Ilie Nastase

ROU

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mike Cahill

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Nastase 2 - 0 Cahill

They have played 4 sets in total, with Ilie Nastase winning 4 and Mike Cahill winning 0. The last match between Ilie Nastase and Mike Cahill was at the Hong Kong, 07-11-1976, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Ilie Nastase getting the victory 7-5 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Nastase	2
Cahill	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R2) Hong Kong(11-07-76)

Stats

Ilie Nastase

Mike Cahill

(R4) Salisbury(02-14-76)

Stats

Ilie Nastase

Mike Cahill

I. Nastase vs M. Cahill H2H Profile

I. Nastase	Stats	M. Cahill
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
72.65% (919-346)	Career Total W/L	43.45% (126-164)
1	Hard	0
1	Indoor	0
62	Titles	1
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

I. Nastase vs M. Cahill Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilie Nastase has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mike Cahill has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilie Nastase, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mike Cahill has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Ilie Nastase has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mike Cahill has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Ilie Nastase has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mike Cahill winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Ilie Nastase has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 87% (W/L 39/6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 205/91). Mike Cahill has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 87% (W/L 41/43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/7).
Player level: In the last year, Ilie Nastase has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mike Cahill has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Ilie Nastase winning 2 times and Mike Cahill being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Ilie Nastase winning 4 and Mike Cahill winning 0.
The last match between Ilie Nastase and Mike Cahill was at the Hong Kong, 07-11-1976, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Ilie Nastase getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilie Nastase has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mike Cahill has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilie Nastase has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mike Cahill has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilie Nastase has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mike Cahill has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Ilie Nastase vs Mike Cahill Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

I. Nastase vs M. Cahill H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

I. Nastase	Stats	M. Cahill
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	0
26	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

I. Nastase Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Dijon CH - 06-06-1988
R3 Kevin MoirK. Moir	L	6-2 7-6	Stats
Toulouse - 07-10-1985
R3 Alessandro De MinicisA. De	W	6-3 1-6 6-3	Stats
R4 Jakob HlasekJ. Hlasek	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Bordeaux - 16-09-1985
R3 Bruno OresarB. Oresar	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
US Open - 27-08-1985
R1 Mike BauerM. Bauer	L	6-3 6-3 4-6 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Cahill Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indianapolis - 01-08-1983
R2 Jairo VelascoJ. Velasco	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Houston-WCT - 04-04-1983
R3 Steve DentonS. Denton	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Dortmund WCT - 15-11-1982
R3 Chip HooperC. Hooper	L	7-5 3-6 6-3	Stats
Maui - 27-09-1982
QF Vincent Van PattenV. Van	L	1-6 7-6 6-0	Stats
R3 Robert Vant HofR. Vant	W	7-6 7-6	Stats

View All

I. Nastase vs M. Cahill Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

I. Nastase	Stats	M. Cahill
72.65% (919/346)	YTD Win/Loss	43.45% (126/164)
67.37% (2246/1088)	Sets Win/Loss	45.31% (304/367)
56.59% (17800/13655)	Games Win/Loss	48.44% (3067/3265)
69.26% (205/91)	Hard Win/Loss	48.81% (41/43)
78.13% (425/119)	Clay Win/Loss	47.76% (64/70)
63.94% (172/97)	Indoor Hard W/L	29.03% (18/44)
70.27% (78/33)	Grass Win/Loss	30.00% (3/7)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
528.31	Average Opponent Rank	625.61
70.50% (98/41)	Slam W/L	33.33% (5/10)
81.63% (80/18)	Masters W/L	45.00% (9/11)
79.78% (71/18)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
71.41% (662/265)	Main Tour W/L	38.91% (86/135)
66.67% (8/4)	Challenger W/L	76.47% (26/8)
73% (636/868)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (118/273)
73% (259/355)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	36% (4/11)
70% (14/20)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/1)
63% (214/341)	Deciding Set Win %	42% (35/83)
91% (840/764)	1st Set Won, Won Match	77% (145/111)
9% (840/75)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	23% (145/34)
34% (401/138)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (144/15)