Ilgiz Kamchibekov vs Cedric Stanke Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Kamchibekov vs C. Stanke

Ilgiz Kamchibekov
KGZ
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
27
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Cedric Stanke
GER
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
21
Age
27
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kamchibekov 1 - 0 Stanke
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ilgiz Kamchibekov winning 2 and Cedric Stanke winning 1. The last match between Ilgiz Kamchibekov and Cedric Stanke was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 07-04-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Ilgiz Kamchibekov getting the victory 6-4 4-6 11-9.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kamchibekov | 1 |
| Stanke | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q2) M15 Sharm ElSheikh(04-07-25)
Ilgiz Kamchibekov
6
4
11
Cedric Stanke
4
6
9
I. Kamchibekov vs C. Stanke H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 31.71% (26-56) | Career Total W/L | 49.49% (98-100) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Kamchibekov vs C. Stanke Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ilgiz Kamchibekov has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cedric Stanke has won 39.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ilgiz Kamchibekov, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cedric Stanke has won 45.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ilgiz Kamchibekov has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cedric Stanke has saved 62.90% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ilgiz Kamchibekov has won 31.25% of matches played (W/L 5/11), with Cedric Stanke winning 54.55% (W/L 24/20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ilgiz Kamchibekov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 13% (W/L 2/14). Cedric Stanke has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 53/40), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 44/58).
- Player level: In the last year, Ilgiz Kamchibekov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 31.25% of matches (W/L 5/11), where as Cedric Stanke has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 24/20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ilgiz Kamchibekov winning 1 times and Cedric Stanke being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ilgiz Kamchibekov winning 2 and Cedric Stanke winning 1.
- The last match between Ilgiz Kamchibekov and Cedric Stanke was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 07-04-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Ilgiz Kamchibekov getting the victory 6-4 4-6 11-9.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ilgiz Kamchibekov has played against opponents with an average rank of 140.94 while Cedric Stanke has played against players with an average rank of 43.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ilgiz Kamchibekov has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cedric Stanke has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ilgiz Kamchibekov has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cedric Stanke has converted 39.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ilgiz Kamchibekov vs Cedric Stanke Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Kamchibekov vs C. Stanke H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 21 | Games Won | 19 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kamchibekov 51%, Stanke 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kamchibekov 38%, Stanke 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Kamchibekov 65%, Stanke 69%.
I. Kamchibekov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 7-6(0) 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-5 1-6 10-8 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 4-6 11-9 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-0 7-6(4) | ||
C. Stanke Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q2 | L | 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q2 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||

I. Kamchibekov vs C. Stanke Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.71% (26/56) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.49% (98/100) |
| 33.51% (62/123) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.44% (219/224) |
| 44.44% (807/1009) | Games Win/Loss | 49.72% (2192/2217) |
| 35.59% (21/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.99% (53/40) |
| 12.50% (2/14) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.14% (44/58) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 49 | Aces Total | 239 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 87 | Total Double Faults | 208 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 157.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 153.38 |
| 64% (1245/1943) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3088/4930) |
| 61% (757/1245) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (2025/3088) |
| 44% (306/697) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (856/1842) |
| 38% (44/116) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (179/409) |
| 34% (601/1755) | Return Points Win % | 38% (1862/4851) |
| 31.71% (26/56) | Futures W/L | 49.49% (98/100) |
| 32% (26/82) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (97/197) |
| 56% (10/18) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
| 52% (11/21) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (24/48) |
| 85% (26/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (101/88) |
| 15% (26/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (101/13) |
| 7% (56/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (97/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction01:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal