Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ida Jarlskog vs Merel Hoedt Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jarlskog vs Hoedt analysis and find out who is favored!
Ida Jarlskog vs Merel Hoedt Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jarlskog has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hoedt has won 43.51%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jarlskog, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hoedt has won 57.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 42.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jarlskog has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hoedt has saved 53.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jarlskog has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hoedt winning 59.38% (W/L 38/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jarlskog has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 45/ 31). Hoedt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 101/ 78), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jarlskog winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Jarlskog winning 3 and Hoedt winning 2. The last match between Jarlskog and Hoedt was at the Den Haag, 06-07-2018, Quarterfinals, Clay with Ida Jarlskog getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jarlskog and Hoedt have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jarlskog winning 0 times and Hoedt 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Jarlskog winning 1, and Hoedt 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jarlskog has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hoedt has played against players with an average rank of 168.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jarlskog has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hoedt has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jarlskog has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hoedt has converted 50.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Jarlskog 1 - 1 Hoedt
Ret.
Rank
729
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
526
Rank
468
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
61% (68-44)
Career Total W/L
55% (158-130)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
57% (12-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Ida Jarlskog | Merel Hoedt |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 24 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:21:30 | 2:21:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (117/171) | 59% (100/169) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (68/117) | 64% (64/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (22/54) | 43% (30/69) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (9/21) | 63% (10/16) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (75/169) | 47% (81/171) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Ida Jarlskog
Player
Merel Hoedt
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| 6-7(7) 6-0 7-5 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Ida Jarlskog
63%
(
70 of
111)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
1
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
3
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
45 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
104)
119
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ida Jarlskog | Merel Hoedt |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (28/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (238/201) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.62 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 132 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:54:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 247.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (920/1376) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (570/920) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (194/456) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (101/203) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (712/1491) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 92% (12/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 8% (12/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
Ida Jarlskog Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 2-6 6-4 10-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Melis Yasar
Player
Ida Jarlskog
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Ida Jarlskog
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ida Jarlskog
Player
Sofia Nami Samavati
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
11 of
41)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ida Jarlskog
Player
Aminata Sall
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
22 of
35)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
18 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
8 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
41
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Timofeeva
Player
Ida Jarlskog
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Merel Hoedt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Maelys Bougrat
Player
Merel Hoedt
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
2
Aces
5
11
Double Faults
25
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
15 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
57%
(
49 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Stephanie Judith Visscher
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Natalia Kowalczyk
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
28%
(
19 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Robbe
Player
Merel Hoedt
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Alexandra Vasilyeva
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
1
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enola Chiesa
Player
Merel Hoedt
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
53%
(
35 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Merel Hoedt
Player
Margot Phanthala
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
17 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carmen Lopez Martinez
Player
Merel Hoedt
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
13
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
101
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Jarlskog Vs Hoedt Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
