Hugo Coquelin vs Finn Bass Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 May at 02:12 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Coquelin vs F. Bass

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Coquelin 0 - 1 Bass
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hugo Coquelin winning 0 and Finn Bass winning 2. The last match between Finn Bass and Hugo Coquelin was at the M25 Nottingham, 05-05-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Finn Bass getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Coquelin | 0 |
| Bass | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Nottingham(05-05-25)
H. Coquelin vs F. Bass H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 51.61% (16-15) | Career Total W/L | 53.73% (144-124) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Coquelin vs F. Bass Match Preview:
What could these players’ recent performances tell us about the outcome of their gripping face-off? When it comes to second-serve points, Bass narrowly edges out Coquelin with a 37.23% win rate in the last six months against Coquelin’s 36.67%. This slight lead may seem insignificant, but it has a proven high correlation with the accuracy of match predictions, especially in such closely contested matches.
Turning our gaze to return stats, one finds that Bass has also been more proficient, claiming 49.07% of their opponent’s second-serve points, compared to Coquelin’s 43.55%. However, Coquelin outshines Bass on first-serve return points, achieving 29.69% compared to Bass’s 22.58%. These figures can heavily influence who is favored when predicting the head-to-head (H2H) outcomes.
When the atmosphere gets tense and pressure builds, saving breakpoints becomes crucial. Bass again leads here, saving 43.98% of breakpoints, with Coquelin behind at 33.33%. Efficiently saving breakpoints can shift the momentum in a closely contested game and is highly valuable for in-game betting predictions.
Looking at the overall performance over the past year, Bass has a win rate of 58.33% (W/L 35/25), while Coquelin stands slightly higher at 63.64% (W/L 7/4). Evaluating their preferred surfaces, Bass has shown superior results on clay, where they win 58% of their matches. Coquelin, on the other hand, finds their strength on hard courts, winning 57% of matches, but falters on indoor hard courts where they haven’t yet claimed a victory.
While both players predominantly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, it seems Coquelin has a slightly better success rate, winning 63.64% of their encounters compared to Bass’s 58.62%. However, Bass has contended with tougher opponents averaging a rank of 229.22 than Coquelin’s substantially lower average rank of 326.18.
Picture this competitive spectacle reaching a deciding set; who would have the upper hand? Bass takes some assurance from having won 53% of their deciding sets in the past year, whereas Coquelin has yet to seize a victory in any deciding set, a fact that could add an edge to Bass's confidence.
Conversion of breakpoints is yet another indicator of form. While Bass has been able to capitalize on 33% of their chances, Coquelin remains close with a conversion rate of 30.77%. Such stats are key indicators for live betting, especially when either player faces the tension of a breakpoint opportunity.
Given these detailed comparisons, the scales of prediction tip subtly in favor of Bass. Their proficiency in dealing with pressure, better second-serve return stats, and resilience in deciding sets indicate that Bass may well emerge victorious. Yet, as always in tennis, surprises await with every swing.
Hugo Coquelin vs Finn Bass Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Coquelin vs F. Bass H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 2 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:8:0 | Average Match Time | 1:8:0 |
| 62% (26/42) | 1st Serve % | 61% (31/51) |
| 62% (16/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (23/31) |
| 19% (3/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
| 0% (0/3) | Break Pts Won % | 63% (5/8) |
| 31% (16/51) | Return Points Win % | 55% (23/42) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Coquelin Recent Matches Played
F. Bass Recent Matches Played

H. Coquelin vs F. Bass Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.61% (16/15) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.73% (144/124) |
| 50.75% (34/33) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.05% (334/284) |
| 49.02% (324/337) | Games Win/Loss | 52.24% (3020/2761) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.76% (100/86) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.83% (28/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 52.94% (9/8) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 32 | Aces Total | 858 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 62 | Total Double Faults | 680 |
| 1:17:44 | Average Match Time | 1:12:53 |
| 168.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 131.73 |
| 58% (924/1583) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7706/12919) |
| 64% (592/924) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5312/7706) |
| 45% (298/659) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2512/5213) |
| 43% (66/153) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (545/1299) |
| 41% (595/1460) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5221/13033) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
| 51.61% (16/15) | Futures W/L | 54.23% (141/119) |
| 52% (15/29) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (142/265) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 29% (2/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (30/58) |
| 57% (4/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (36/83) |
| 94% (16/15) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (145/122) |
| 6% (16/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (145/23) |
| 7% (15/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (123/22) |