Honori Koyama vs Anastasiya Krymkova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Koyama's second serve performance compare to Krymkova's? Koyama slightly edges out Krymkova, winning 35.64% of their second serve points compared to Krymkova's 34.19% over the last six months.
• What about their return game performance? Koyama has a stronger return game as well, winning 55.48% of their opponent's second serve points versus Krymkova's 48.94%. For first serve returns, the difference is more significant, with Koyama at 35.76% and Krymkova at 26.83%.
• Under pressure, Krymkova has saved 51.72% of breakpoints, slightly better than Koyama at 47.24%. This may be crucial for in-game prediction strategies.
• Looking at overall match performance over the past year, Koyama has won 53.66% of their matches, whereas Krymkova has a 50% win rate, indicating a slight performance edge for Koyama.
• Surface preferences show that Koyama performs best on hard courts, winning 51% of their matches, while Krymkova excels on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate.
• Both players have primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with Koyama achieving a slightly higher win percentage of 55.26% compared to Krymkova's 50%.
• Koyama has battled against stronger opponents, with an average opponent rank of 133.71 compared to Krymkova's 176.35 over the last year.
• If the match enters a deciding set, Koyama has a 64% win rate in such scenarios, compared to Krymkova's 60%.
• Conversion of breakpoints is again a slight advantage for Koyama, with a conversion rate of 37.27% compared to Krymkova's 34.38%.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming tennis matchup, analysis of the statistics provides a clearer picture of each player's strengths and weaknesses. Koyama holds an edge in several key areas that are often pivotal in determining match outcomes. Their better performance in second serve points and return games signals a potential upper hand against Krymkova.

Despite Krymkova's resilience in saving breakpoints, Koyama's higher overall match win percentage and experience against tougher opponents suggest a marginally stronger overall form. Additionally, Koyama's proficiency on hard courts adds to their advantage, given the surface preference.

Break point conversion and deciding set statistics also tip slightly in Koyama’s favor, showcasing their ability to remain effective under pressure. Based on these analyses, Koyama appears to have a slightly better chance of clinching the victory in this tightly contested match.