Holger Rune vs Jenson Brooksby Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Sep at 05:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Rune vs J. Brooksby

DEN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Rune 0 - 1 Brooksby
They have played 2 sets in total, with Holger Rune winning 0 and Jenson Brooksby winning 2. The last match between Jenson Brooksby and Holger Rune was at the Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo, 28-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Jenson Brooksby getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Rune | 0 |
| Brooksby | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo(09-28-25)
H. Rune vs J. Brooksby H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $9,902,260 | Career Prize Money | $2,553,345 |
| 65.23% (287-153) | Career Total W/L | 63.45% (184-106) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 14 | Titles | 7 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 62.07% (36-22) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.33% (21-15) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
H. Rune vs J. Brooksby Match Preview:
- Holger Rune has shown better form on second serves, winning 47.19% of points, compared to Jenson Brooksby's 43.89% over the past six months. Could this be a critical factor in determining the match winner?
- Jenson Brooksby has the edge in return games recently, winning 45.95% of points on opponents' second serves against Rune's 43.53%.
- Both players have comparable performances in handling pressure, with Brooksby narrowly leading by saving 56.93% of breakpoints, while Rune saves 56.47%.
- Rune boasts a superior annual match-winning percentage of 64.06% compared to Brooksby's 55.81%. Does this give Rune an overarching advantage?
- Despite Rune's best surface being Indoor hard with a 71% win rate, Brooksby excels on Clay with a 66% win rate. Could surface preferences impact the match outcome?
- Rune frequently competes at the Masters series level, achieving a 65.38% success rate, whereas Brooksby focuses on the Main tour with a 71.43% success record. How might this varied experience affect their match play?
- Over the previous year, Rune has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 63.41, while Brooksby's opponents averaged 107.63 in rank.
- Past deciding set encounters demonstrate Brooksby’s strength, with a 64% win rate in deciding sets, compared to Rune’s 60%. Will this be pivotal if the match goes the distance?
Editorial Prediction (September 28, 2025, UTC):
Both Holger Rune and Jenson Brooksby bring distinctive strengths to this match. Rune's second serve performance and overall higher competition level grant him a slight edge in terms of skill and experience.
Brooksby, however, demonstrates an advantage in return games and has performed well under pressure, achieving better deciding set outcomes in recent tournaments.
Although both have clear strengths, Holger Rune’s consistent overall performance and ability to compete against higher-ranked opponents make him the likely victor in this upcoming match.
Holger Rune vs Jenson Brooksby Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Rune vs J. Brooksby H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 12 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:30:43 | Average Match Time | 1:30:43 |
| 67% (39/58) | 1st Serve % | 65% (40/62) |
| 72% (28/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (27/40) |
| 21% (4/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (12/22) |
| 20% (1/5) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 37% (23/62) | Return Points Win % | 45% (26/58) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Rune Recent Matches Played
J. Brooksby Recent Matches Played

H. Rune vs J. Brooksby Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.23% (287/153) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.45% (184/106) |
| 61.44% (674/423) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.54% (415/282) |
| 53.23% (5615/4934) | Games Win/Loss | 53.65% (3465/2994) |
| 58.20% (71/51) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.64% (112/64) |
| 67.69% (132/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.96% (31/16) |
| 70.59% (72/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.79% (27/16) |
| 57.14% (12/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 58.33% (14/10) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1829 | Aces Total | 584 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1253 | Total Double Faults | 403 |
| 1:48:6 | Average Match Time | 1:33:53 |
| 279.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 340.87 |
| 63% (20082/32118) | 1st Serve % | 66% (12065/18334) |
| 71% (14216/20082) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (8079/12065) |
| 53% (6431/12036) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3229/6269) |
| 42% (1279/3030) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (815/1842) |
| 39% (12539/32441) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7487/18333) |
| 65.31% (32/17) | Slam W/L | 61.29% (19/12) |
| 63.44% (59/34) | Masters W/L | 54.55% (18/15) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63.27% (93/54) | Main Tour W/L | 63.77% (44/25) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69.57% (48/21) | Challenger W/L | 64.29% (36/20) |
| 71.88% (46/18) | Futures W/L | 66.34% (67/34) |
| 66% (253/383) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (166/260) |
| 62% (31/50) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 61% (105/173) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 62% (48/78) |
| 59% (86/147) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (48/80) |
| 88% (267/235) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (172/155) |
| 12% (267/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (172/17) |
| 30% (173/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (118/28) |