Hikari Yamamoto (1995) vs Aslina An Ping Chua Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

H. Yamamoto (1995) vs A. An Ping Chua

Hikari Yamamoto (1995)
Hikari Yamamoto (1995)

Flag JPN JPN

Aslina An Ping Chua
Aslina An Ping Chua

Flag MAS MAS

0

Win

0

Played

0

Win

30
Age
29
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Yamamoto 0 - 0 Chua

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Yamamoto0
Chua0
Last 0 H2H Matches:

No past h2h happened.

H. Yamamoto vs A. A. P. Chua H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
0% (0-0)Career Total W/L0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

H. Yamamoto vs A. A. P. Chua Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hikari Yamamoto (1995) has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Aslina An Ping Chua has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hikari Yamamoto (1995), in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aslina An Ping Chua has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Hikari Yamamoto (1995) has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aslina An Ping Chua has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Hikari Yamamoto (1995) has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Aslina An Ping Chua winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Hikari Yamamoto (1995) has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L /), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L /). Aslina An Ping Chua has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L /), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L /).
  • Player level: In the last year, Hikari Yamamoto (1995) has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Aslina An Ping Chua has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hikari Yamamoto (1995) has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Aslina An Ping Chua has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hikari Yamamoto (1995) has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aslina An Ping Chua has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Hikari Yamamoto (1995) has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aslina An Ping Chua has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Hikari Yamamoto (1995) vs Aslina An Ping Chua Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Yamamoto 0%, Chua 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Yamamoto 0%, Chua 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Yamamoto 0%, Chua 0%.

H. Yamamoto Recent Matches Played

Empty Result

A. A. P. Chua Recent Matches Played

Empty Result
banner

H. Yamamoto vs A. A. P. Chua Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match

Other Tennis Predictions Today

06:30 AM 21/11/25
Prediction
JPNY. Kusuharaq
AUSA. Santillan
W1
3.34
W2
1.27
07:15 PM 21/11/25
Prediction
RUSI. Gakhov
ITAL. Giustino6
W1
2.33
W2
1.52
05:10 AM 21/11/25
Prediction
JPNY. Uchiyama7
JPNR. Sakamoto2
W1
2.11
W2
1.63
12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction
FRAM. Erhard4
CZEM. Mrva7
W1
2.28
W2
1.54
12:00 PM 21/11/25
Prediction
ROUL. Preda
GREI. Xilas5
W1
2.35
W2
1.51
05:05 AM 21/11/25
Prediction
USAE. Zhu1
POLK. Filar7
W1
1.69
W2
2.02