Harriet Dart vs Amelia Rajecki Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 03:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Dart vs A. Rajecki

GBR
2
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dart 2 - 0 Rajecki
They have played 4 sets in total, with Harriet Dart winning 4 and Amelia Rajecki winning 0. The last match between Harriet Dart and Amelia Rajecki was at the W75 Toronto, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Harriet Dart getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dart | 2 |
| Rajecki | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) W75 Toronto(10-30-25)
(R1) Lexus Ilkley Open - Ilkley(06-10-25)
H. Dart vs A. Rajecki H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,798,749 | Career Prize Money | $4,965 |
| 55.84% (373-295) | Career Total W/L | 52.63% (70-63) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 11.11% (1-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Dart vs A. Rajecki Match Preview:
- In the past six months, Amelia Rajecki marginally edges Harriet Dart in second serve points won, with Rajecki at 40.84% and Dart at 40.74%. However, could this slight difference be significant enough?
- Examining return game stats, Harriet Dart seems stronger. She has won 50.96% of her opponent's second serve points, compared to 49.42% for Rajecki.
- Harriet Dart also has a clear advantage in returning first serves, achieving 32.95% success compared to Rajecki’s 27.20%.
- Pressure resilience shows Amelia Rajecki excels in saving breakpoints, with a 49.81% save rate, while Dart trails at 44.54%.
- Overall match performance over the past year favors Rajecki for wins, with a slight advantage, having a 51.67% win rate compared to Dart's 47.62%.
- Both players excel on indoor hard surfaces, but they've shown weaknesses on other surfaces: Rajecki on Grass and Dart on Clay.
- At the Challenger/ITF event level, Dart achieves a superior win rate of 68.18% compared to Rajecki’s 51.85%.
- In their head-to-head history, Harriet Dart leads with a win, outplaying Rajecki in their sole encounter, which was held on Grass.
- Considering quality of opponents, Dart has faced higher-ranked challengers, with an average opponent rank of 217, while Rajecki’s opponents averaged a rank of 398.98.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Dart has a notable advantage, winning 60% of such sets compared to Rajecki’s 47%.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
Both players show competitive form entering this matchup, each with distinct strengths and certain vulnerabilities. Harriet Dart displays a somewhat superior ability in return games and has faced tougher competition in recent months.
While Amelia Rajecki demonstrates an edge in breakpoints saved and has improved her overall match winning rate slightly above Dart’s, past encounters reflect Dart's prevailing upper hand.
Consistently returning stronger opponents' serves and performing well under high-pressure situations, Dart appears better poised to control the match dynamics.
Given the analysis and historical context, Harriet Dart is anticipated to come out as the likely winner in this matchup.
Harriet Dart vs Amelia Rajecki Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Dart vs A. Rajecki H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 9 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 1:25:53 | Average Match Time | 1:25:53 |
| 56% (60/107) | 1st Serve % | 59% (84/143) |
| 80% (48/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (53/84) |
| 51% (24/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 31% (18/59) |
| 41% (9/22) | Break Pts Won % | 9% (1/11) |
| 50% (72/143) | Return Points Win % | 33% (35/107) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Dart Recent Matches Played
A. Rajecki Recent Matches Played

H. Dart vs A. Rajecki Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.84% (373/295) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.63% (70/63) |
| 54.49% (843/704) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.16% (160/141) |
| 52.23% (7359/6731) | Games Win/Loss | 51.82% (1437/1336) |
| 58.76% (218/153) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.93% (39/32) |
| 41.79% (28/39) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.83% (81/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.81% (24/19) |
| 46.46% (46/53) | Grass Win/Loss | 36.84% (7/12) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.45 |
| 958 | Aces Total | 601 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.5 |
| 1851 | Total Double Faults | 675 |
| 1:17:25 | Average Match Time | 1:28:53 |
| 448.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 407.62 |
| 55% (19337/35209) | 1st Serve % | 57% (4914/8590) |
| 64% (12331/19337) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (3425/4914) |
| 45% (7219/15872) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1613/3676) |
| 48% (2149/4454) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (389/841) |
| 46% (16449/35741) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3386/8128) |
| 53.85% (35/30) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 43.18% (19/25) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.19% (61/74) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (3/4) |
| 59.86% (167/112) | Challenger W/L | 50.47% (54/53) |
| 64.44% (87/48) | Futures W/L | 76.47% (13/4) |
| 56% (367/655) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (68/131) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (80/153) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (17/29) |
| 55% (122/222) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (15/37) |
| 83% (369/307) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (68/60) |
| 17% (369/62) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (68/8) |
| 22% (299/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (65/10) |