Hanyu Guo vs Anna Bondar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 06:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Guo vs A. Bondar

CHN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

HUN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Guo 0 - 1 Bondar
They have played 3 sets in total, with Hanyu Guo winning 1 and Anna Bondar winning 2. The last match between Anna Bondar and Hanyu Guo was at the Guangzhou Open - Guangzhou, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 6-3 3-6 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guo | 0 |
| Bondar | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Guangzhou Open - Guangzhou(10-21-25)
H. Guo vs A. Bondar H2H Profile
H. Guo vs A. Bondar Match Preview:
- In recent form, Anna Bondar has outperformed Hanyu Guo in second serve points, winning 43.74% compared to Guo's 39.91%. Does this indicate a significant edge for Bondar? Yes, as second serve success often correlates with match predictions.
- When comparing return games, Hanyu Guo has a slight advantage on opponent's second serve returns, winning 50.06% over Bondar's 49.11%. However, Guo also excels in first serve returns with 35.61%, surpassing Bondar's 29.99%.
- Under pressure, Bondar showcases resilience by saving 49.87% of breakpoints, outperforming Guo's 43.71%. Could this hint at Bondar handling critical moments better? It seems likely.
- Bondar has won 57.14% of matches over the last year, whereas Guo boasts a stronger 69.12% match win rate, indicating Guo's consistency in performance.
- On preferred surfaces, Bondar excels on Clay with a 69% win rate, while Guo performs best on Indoor hard courts. Bondar has a notably poor record on Grass, at just 11%.
- Both players dominate in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with near-identical winning percentages: Bondar with 73.08% and Guo with 73.21%.
- Opponent quality analysis shows Bondar challenging stronger players, with an average opponent rank of 168.14 compared to Guo’s 337.07.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Guo shines with a 72% success rate, significantly higher than Bondar's 45%.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent second serve performance, Anna Bondar holds a slight advantage with greater effectiveness. This could be a critical component in deciding the outcome of the match.
Despite Bondar's strong serving stats, Hanyu Guo's superior performance on return games, particularly against first serves, levels the playing field.
Resilience under pressure favors Bondar, as she saves breakpoints more effectively than Guo. This could become decisive during critical moments in the match.
While Bondar faces better-ranked opponents and has excelled in certain tournament conditions, Guo's higher overall win percentage suggests consistency on the tour.
If the match progresses to a deciding set, Guo's impressive track record gives her a clear edge.
Although there are strengths on both sides, the slight edge in several key areas suggests that Hanyu Guo is more likely to emerge as the winner in this match up.
Hanyu Guo vs Anna Bondar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Guo vs A. Bondar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 15 | Games Won | 16 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:34:20 | Average Match Time | 2:34:20 |
| 51% (45/89) | 1st Serve % | 71% (70/98) |
| 58% (26/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (42/70) |
| 50% (22/44) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 60% (6/10) | Break Pts Won % | 75% (6/8) |
| 44% (43/98) | Return Points Win % | 46% (41/89) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Guo Recent Matches Played
A. Bondar Recent Matches Played

H. Guo vs A. Bondar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.96% (228/140) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.98% (444/261) |
| 59.11% (506/350) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.14% (988/628) |
| 53.79% (4205/3613) | Games Win/Loss | 54.13% (8167/6920) |
| 62.74% (197/117) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.36% (93/75) |
| 54.55% (24/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.08% (324/145) |
| 70.00% (7/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44.07% (26/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 11.11% (1/8) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 379 | Aces Total | 2210 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1054 | Total Double Faults | 1228 |
| 1:23:6 | Average Match Time | 1:29:50 |
| 533.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 442.03 |
| 62% (12493/20178) | 1st Serve % | 59% (24595/41730) |
| 61% (7563/12493) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (16223/24595) |
| 46% (3565/7685) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (8223/17135) |
| 49% (1312/2658) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2367/5064) |
| 48% (9537/20075) | Return Points Win % | 44% (18854/42493) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 27.59% (8/21) |
| 42.86% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 45.83% (11/13) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (57/57) |
| 60.70% (156/101) | Challenger W/L | 66.28% (230/117) |
| 72.15% (57/22) | Futures W/L | 78.21% (122/34) |
| 62% (225/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (436/696) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 61% (43/70) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (97/184) |
| 58% (69/119) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (105/211) |
| 86% (218/188) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (453/394) |
| 14% (218/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (453/59) |
| 27% (150/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (252/50) |