Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Hanne Vandewinkel vs Iva Primorac Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vandewinkel vs Primorac analysis and find out who is favored!
Hanne Vandewinkel vs Iva Primorac Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vandewinkel has won 42.48% of points on his second serve, while Primorac has won 45.01%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vandewinkel, in recent form, has won 56.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Primorac has won 59.74%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.9% and 39.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vandewinkel has saved 52% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Primorac has saved 51.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vandewinkel has won 63.24% of matches played (W/L 43/ 25), with Primorac winning 62.22% (W/L 28/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vandewinkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 46/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 43/ 24). Primorac has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 200/ 129), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 24/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Vandewinkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.15% of matches (W/L 43/ 22), where as Primorac has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vandewinkel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vandewinkel winning 2 and Primorac winning 0. The last match between Vandewinkel and Primorac was at the W15 Manacor, 03-03-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Hanne Vandewinkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vandewinkel and Primorac have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vandewinkel winning 0 times and Primorac 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vandewinkel winning 0, and Primorac 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vandewinkel has played against opponents with an average rank of 251.94 while Primorac has played against players with an average rank of 310.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vandewinkel has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Primorac has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vandewinkel has converted 50.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Primorac has converted 47.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vandewinkel 1 - 0 Primorac
278
Rank
278
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
502
Rank
480
High
28
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
68% (96-45)
Career Total W/L
59% (264-182)
53% (10-9)
YTD W/L
60% (9-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vandewinkel VS Primorac H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Hanne Vandewinkel | Iva Primorac |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:0:0 | 1:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (19/31) | 59% (26/44) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 89% (17/19) | 54% (14/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 92% (11/12) | 22% (4/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 59% (26/44) | 10% (3/31) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Vandewinkel VS Primorac H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Iva Primorac
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Hanne Vandewinkel | Iva Primorac |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 53% (10/9) | 60% (9/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (25/21) | 56% (19/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (226/207) | 54% (174/151) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 30 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 60 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:18 | 1:39:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 210.95 | 404.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (963/1447) | 65% (632/976) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (585/963) | 60% (379/632) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (216/484) | 44% (150/344) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (90/173) | 49% (65/133) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (622/1348) | 48% (450/941) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (10/7) | 55% (6/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 64% (9/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 38% (8/3) |
Hanne Vandewinkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
12%
(
4 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
27)
45%
(
10 of
22)
Break Points Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
51%
(
52 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
56 of
91)
106
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Daniela Vismane
78%
(
66 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Ekaterine Gorgodze
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
85%
(
62 of
73)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
92
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
20 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carole Monnet
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hanne Vandewinkel
Player
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Zaytseva
Player
Hanne Vandewinkel
79%
(
70 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
96)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Iva Primorac Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yana Morderger
Player
Iva Primorac
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Mariana Drazic
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Iva Primorac
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mihaela Djakovic
Player
Iva Primorac
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
41
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 7-5 10-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Iva Primorac
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Daniela Vismane
35%
(
19 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Natalia Szabanin
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
52 of
106)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Primorac
Player
Alba Rey Garcia
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Iva Primorac
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Vandewinkel Vs Primorac Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
