Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Guido Andreozzi vs Jordi Samper-Montana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Andreozzi vs Samper-Montana analysis and find out who is favored!
Guido Andreozzi vs Jordi Samper-Montana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Andreozzi has won 45.16% of points on his second serve, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Andreozzi, in recent form, has won 47.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.87% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Andreozzi has saved 61.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samper-Montana has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Andreozzi has won 48.89% of matches played (W/L 22/ 23), with Samper-Montana winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Andreozzi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 339/ 241), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 23% (W/L 3/ 10). Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Andreozzi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.72% of matches (W/L 19/ 20), where as Samper-Montana has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Andreozzi winning 3 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Andreozzi winning 6 and Samper-Montana winning 1. The last match between Andreozzi and Samper-Montana was at the Cortina Challenger, 25-07-2017, First, Clay with Guido Andreozzi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Andreozzi and Samper-Montana have played a deciding set 1 times, with Andreozzi winning 1 times and Samper-Montana 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Andreozzi winning 0, and Samper-Montana 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Andreozzi has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.11 while Samper-Montana has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Andreozzi has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samper-Montana has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Andreozzi has converted 34.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samper-Montana has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Andreozzi 3 - 0 Samper-Montana
288
Rank
70
High
32
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
3
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
57% (428-318)
Career Total W/L
56% (442-346)
43% (3-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$395,354
Career Prize Money
$84,925
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andreozzi VS Samper-Montana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Guido Andreozzi | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
| Games Won | 42 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:52 | 1:21:52 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (120/168) | 60% (100/167) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (92/120) | 62% (62/100) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (30/48) | 33% (22/67) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 82% (14/17) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (83/167) | 27% (46/168) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Andreozzi VS Samper-Montana H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
8 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 6-0 6-3 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 6-1 6-7(4) 6-1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Guido Andreozzi | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (73/88) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.58 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 156.29 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (312/571) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (213/312) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (113/259) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (19/49) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (181/488) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Guido Andreozzi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Dominik Kellovsky
Player
Guido Andreozzi
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Guido Andreozzi
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
50 of
68)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Francesco Passaro
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
86)
1
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
54 of
64)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
20 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Daniel Lara Salmeron
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
49%
(
62 of
126)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
6
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
9
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
45%
(
29 of
64)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
56 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
107)
122
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(1) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Guido Andreozzi
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Guido Andreozzi
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Guido Andreozzi
82%
(
92 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
7
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
48 of
61)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
111
|
3-6 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Guido Andreozzi
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Andreozzi Vs Samper-Montana Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
