Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Grzegorz Panfil vs Patrik Niklas-Salminen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Panfil vs Niklas-Salminen analysis and find out who is favored!
Grzegorz Panfil vs Patrik Niklas-Salminen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Panfil has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Panfil, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Panfil has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niklas-Salminen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Panfil has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Niklas-Salminen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Panfil has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 328/ 221), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 49% (W/L 42/ 44). Niklas-Salminen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 48/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Panfil winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Panfil winning 2 and Niklas-Salminen winning 0. The last match between Panfil and Niklas-Salminen was at the Poland F3, 08-06-2016, Second, Clay with Grzegorz Panfil getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Panfil and Niklas-Salminen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Panfil winning 0 times and Niklas-Salminen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Panfil winning 0, and Niklas-Salminen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Panfil has played against opponents with an average rank of while Niklas-Salminen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Panfil has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niklas-Salminen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Panfil has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niklas-Salminen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Panfil 1 - 0 Niklas-Salminen
Ret.
Rank
238
High
36
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
881
Rank
418
High
27
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
57% (422-320)
Career Total W/L
53% (164-147)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$650
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Panfil VS Niklas-Salminen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Grzegorz Panfil | Patrik Niklas-Salminen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:27:0 | 1:27:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (31/53) | 66% (45/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (26/31) | 56% (25/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (11/22) | 48% (11/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (32/68) | 30% (16/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Panfil VS Niklas-Salminen H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Grzegorz Panfil
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Grzegorz Panfil | Patrik Niklas-Salminen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grzegorz Panfil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jan Satral
Player
Grzegorz Panfil
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Grzegorz Panfil
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
1
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Grzegorz Panfil
Player
Andrey Yakovlev
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
35%
(
11 of
31)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Grzegorz Panfil
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maciej Rajski
Player
Grzegorz Panfil
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grzegorz Panfil
Player
Bartosz Wojnar
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
57%
(
17 of
30)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Grzegorz Panfil
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
8
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grzegorz Panfil
Player
Ivan Yatsuk
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
65
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grzegorz Panfil
Player
Patrick Daciek
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
77%
(
88 of
115)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
50 of
88)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
59 of
115)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrik Niklas-Salminen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
73%
(
69 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
10
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
55 of
69)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
65 of
78)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
22 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
29 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Karol Drzewiecki
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Giustino
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
15 of
19)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aleksi Lofman
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Peetu Pohjola
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
Player
Oskari Eerola
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alastair Gray
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Billy Blaydes
Player
Patrik Niklas-Salminen
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Panfil Vs Niklas-Salminen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
