Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Govind Nanda vs Patrick Kypson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nanda vs Kypson analysis and find out who is favored!
Govind Nanda vs Patrick Kypson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nanda has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kypson has won 51.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nanda, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kypson has won 49.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nanda has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kypson has saved 69.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nanda has won 40% of matches played (W/L 2/ 3), with Kypson winning 59.68% (W/L 37/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Kypson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 94/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 67/ 51).
- Player level: In the last year, Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Kypson has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 30/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nanda winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Nanda winning 3 and Kypson winning 2. The last match between Nanda and Kypson was at the M25 Wichita, 13-06-2021, Final, Hard with Govind Nanda getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nanda and Kypson have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nanda winning 0 times and Kypson 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nanda winning 1, and Kypson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nanda has played against opponents with an average rank of 122 while Kypson has played against players with an average rank of 273.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nanda has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kypson has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nanda has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kypson has converted 43.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nanda 1 - 1 Kypson
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
144
Rank
133
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
58% (112-80)
Career Total W/L
64% (193-109)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$56,390
Career Prize Money
$102,295
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Govind Nanda | Patrick Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 26 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:0 | 2:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (80/154) | 66% (121/183) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (59/80) | 65% (79/121) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (38/74) | 52% (32/62) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 26% (6/23) | 75% (6/8) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (72/183) | 37% (57/154) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-2 |
Stats 
Govind Nanda
Player
Patrick Kypson
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 6-2 3-6 7-5 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Govind Nanda
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Govind Nanda | Patrick Kypson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (27/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (264/241) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.73 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 182 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:42:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 229.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (903/1511) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 77% (694/903) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 53% (324/608) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (45/106) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (510/1499) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (11/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Segura
Player
Govind Nanda
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Patrick Kypson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Janvier
Player
Patrick Kypson
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Brandon Holt
44%
(
8 of
18)
1st Serve %
87%
(
13 of
15)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Patrick Kypson
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
12
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Patrick Kypson
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Ethan Quinn
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
10
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Patrick Kypson
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
72%
(
42 of
58)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
33 of
42)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nanda Vs Kypson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
