Gonzalo Lama vs Fabio Mercuri Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lama vs Mercuri analysis and find out who is favored!
Gonzalo Lama vs Fabio Mercuri Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lama has won 52.34% of points on his second serve, while Mercuri has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lama, in recent form, has won 46.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mercuri has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.53% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lama has saved 57.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mercuri has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lama has won 43.24% of matches played (W/L 16/ 21), with Mercuri winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lama has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 362/ 245), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mercuri has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 83/ 76), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 10/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Lama has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 12/ 16), where as Mercuri has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lama winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lama winning 2 and Mercuri winning 1. The last match between Lama and Mercuri was at the Italy F20, 27-07-2015, Second, Clay with Gonzalo Lama getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lama and Mercuri have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lama winning 1 times and Mercuri 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lama winning 0, and Mercuri 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lama has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.43 while Mercuri has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lama has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mercuri has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lama has converted 10% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mercuri has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lama 1 - 0 Mercuri
16
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
14
Minor
528
Rank
160
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (381-282)
Career Total W/L
51% (93-91)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$18,335
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Gonzalo Lama | Fabio Mercuri |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 15 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-1 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Gonzalo Lama | Fabio Mercuri |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 14% (2/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0 |
DFs Total | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:10:1 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 481 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 38% (17/45) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 47% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 36% (10/28) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 27% (12/44) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gonzalo Lama Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Gonzalo Lama
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Wilson Leite
Player
Gonzalo Lama
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(10) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Ignacio Carou
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
16 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Facundo Juarez
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Gonzalo Lama
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
127)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
122
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(2) 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Hernan Casanova
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 0-2 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lorenzo Claverie
Player
Gonzalo Lama
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
94)
20
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
89%
(
42 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
42 of
53)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Luciano Darderi
Player
Gonzalo Lama
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
92%
(
24 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Fabio Mercuri Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Andrea Basso
Player
Fabio Mercuri
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Fabio Mercuri
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Fabio Mercuri
Player
Nikola Cacic
82%
(
64 of
78)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
24%
(
16 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more