Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Giulio Zeppieri vs Otto Virtanen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zeppieri vs Virtanen analysis and find out who is favored!
Giulio Zeppieri vs Otto Virtanen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zeppieri has won 51.88% of points on his second serve, while Virtanen has won 47.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zeppieri, in recent form, has won 50% of his opponent's second serve points, while Virtanen has won 50.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.94% and 30.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zeppieri has saved 65.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Virtanen has saved 59.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zeppieri has won 57.35% of matches played (W/L 39/ 29), with Virtanen winning 55.38% (W/L 36/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zeppieri has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 16/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Virtanen has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 111/ 43), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 15/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Zeppieri has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.06% of matches (W/L 18/ 13), where as Virtanen has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zeppieri has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.69 while Virtanen has played against players with an average rank of 238.12.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zeppieri has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Virtanen has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zeppieri has converted 37.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Virtanen has converted 42.93% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zeppieri 0 - 0 Virtanen
141
Rank
110
High
22
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
158
Rank
109
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
55% (152-123)
Career Total W/L
60% (181-119)
54% (13-11)
YTD W/L
70% (19-8)
$540,695
Career Prize Money
$146,665
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Giulio Zeppieri | Otto Virtanen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (13/11) | 70% (19/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (35/27) | 65% (39/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (322/285) | 53% (302/267) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (3/4) | 94% (16/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.72 | 0.84 |
| Aces Total | 216 | 233 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 62 | 102 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:32 | 1:21:51 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 166.33 | 239.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1139/1856) | 60% (1089/1815) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (864/1139) | 72% (786/1089) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (369/717) | 47% (341/726) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (60/162) | 44% (78/178) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (649/1825) | 39% (680/1738) |
| Slam W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 47% (7/8) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 76% (16/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 69% (18/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 80% (8/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 30% (3/10) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 65% (17/11) | 100% (15/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 35% (17/6) | 0% (15/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 25% (12/3) |
Giulio Zeppieri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
49%
(
38 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
7
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arthur Cazaux
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
9%
(
1 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
11 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Alexandre Muller
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
12
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Damir Dzumhur
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Rashed Nawaf
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Otto Virtanen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Otto Virtanen
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Otto Virtanen
79%
(
70 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
1
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
44 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
27 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
32 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Jurij Rodionov
89%
(
77 of
87)
1st Serve %
100%
(
78 of
78)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
8 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Daniel Masur
53%
(
70 of
132)
1st Serve %
61%
(
72 of
119)
16
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
51 of
72)
48%
(
30 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
119)
127
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Rudolf Molleker
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
14
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
17 of
21)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Remy Bertola
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Otto Virtanen
79%
(
69 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
12
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zeppieri Vs Virtanen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
