Gilles Arnaud Bailly vs Ryan Nijboer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When examining recent second serve performance, Gilles Arnaud Bailly has a slight edge, winning 42.45% of those points, compared to Ryan Nijboer's 39.57%. Could this small difference influence the match outcome?
• In return games, Ryan Nijboer shows proficiency with a 46.14% success rate on opponents' second serves, slightly surpassing Bailly's 44.72%. Does this give Nijboer an advantage in breaking serve?
• First serve return stats highlight Nijboer's slight upper hand, winning 29.79% of points versus Bailly's 28.33%. Might this tilt the favor towards Nijboer during crucial points?
• Under pressure, Nijboer excels by saving 53.31% of breakpoints compared to Bailly's 46.14%. Could this resilience play a pivotal role in tight moments during the match?
• Gilles Arnaud Bailly demonstrates a stronger overall match-winning percentage over the past year, securing 74.44% of his matches, whereas Nijboer has won 55.29%. Does this suggest Bailly's better form?
• Both players perform best on Hard courts, with each having a 70% win rate. However, Nijboer struggles more on Indoor Hard courts with just a 22% win rate, compared to Bailly’s 40%.
• Given the level of play, Bailly shows higher performance consistency, winning 75.68% in lower-tier events, while Nijboer's figures drop to 65.96%. Might Bailly's consistency give him an edge?
• Bailly has faced opponents with a slightly higher average ranking (388.43) than Nijboer (459.24) over the past year. Could facing tougher opponents better prepare Bailly for this match?
• In deciding sets, Bailly holds a significant advantage, winning 70% of such encounters compared to Nijboer's 39%. If the match goes the distance, is Bailly more likely to triumph?

Editorial Prediction (October 25, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match between Gilles Arnaud Bailly and Ryan Nijboer presents an intriguing dynamic with both players showing distinct strengths.

Bailly's recent form indicates a consistent match-winning trend and superior experience against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting a level of preparedness that could impact the match decisively. Additionally, his effectiveness in deciding sets reinforces his capability to perform under pressure.

While Nijboer exhibits strong return game statistics and breakpoint resilience, which could disrupt Bailly's serve, the overall statistical landscape seems to favor Bailly.

Considering these factors, Gilles Arnaud Bailly appears to be the more likely winner in this matchup.