Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gijs Brouwer vs Markus Eriksson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brouwer vs Eriksson analysis and find out who is favored!
Gijs Brouwer vs Markus Eriksson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brouwer has won 51.08% of points on his second serve, while Eriksson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brouwer, in recent form, has won 49.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Eriksson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.66% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brouwer has saved 62.76% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eriksson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brouwer has won 44.07% of matches played (W/L 26/ 33), with Eriksson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brouwer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 90/ 55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 82/ 69). Eriksson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 258/ 182), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 75/ 68).
- Player level: In the last year, Brouwer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 16/ 20), where as Eriksson has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brouwer winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Brouwer winning 2 and Eriksson winning 1. The last match between Brouwer and Eriksson was at the M25 Sunderland, 25-02-2020, First, I.hard with Gijs Brouwer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brouwer and Eriksson have played a deciding set 1 times, with Brouwer winning 1 times and Eriksson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Brouwer winning 0, and Eriksson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brouwer has played against opponents with an average rank of 208.97 while Eriksson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brouwer has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eriksson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brouwer has converted 33.53% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eriksson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brouwer 1 - 0 Eriksson
252
Rank
114
High
28
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
277
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
58% (309-226)
Career Total W/L
57% (405-310)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$277,135
Career Prize Money
$500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gijs Brouwer | Markus Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (45/70) | 64% (49/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (38/45) | 69% (34/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (14/25) | 50% (14/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (29/77) | 26% (18/70) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Markus Eriksson
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
15
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gijs Brouwer | Markus Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (25/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (264/255) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 116 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:21 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 262.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1118/1644) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (771/1118) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (272/526) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (56/167) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (644/1694) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (9/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (12/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Gijs Brouwer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Gijs Brouwer
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Denis Kudla
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Hady Habib
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Gijs Brouwer
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Dominik Palan
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Gijs Brouwer
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Gijs Brouwer
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Tristan Boyer
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
6-0 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Gijs Brouwer
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
14
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Markus Eriksson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Ryan James Storrie
Player
Markus Eriksson
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Jonas Trinker
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Ioannis Stamoulos
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
37
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
William Ma
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Markus Eriksson
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Markus Eriksson
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Markus Eriksson
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
53 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
25 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Mridha
Player
Markus Eriksson
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Markus Eriksson
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wojciech Marek
Player
Markus Eriksson
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Brouwer Vs Eriksson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Gijs Brouwer
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
