Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gijs Brouwer vs Evan Zhu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brouwer vs Zhu analysis and find out who is favored!
Gijs Brouwer vs Evan Zhu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brouwer has won 49.45% of points on his second serve, while Zhu has won 36.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brouwer, in recent form, has won 49.88% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zhu has won 46.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.1% and 32.07% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brouwer has saved 65.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zhu has saved 51.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brouwer has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 24/ 32), with Zhu winning 47.06% (W/L 24/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brouwer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 90/ 55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 82/ 69). Zhu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 69/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Brouwer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Zhu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.14% of matches (W/L 13/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Brouwer winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Brouwer winning 4 and Zhu winning 1. The last match between Brouwer and Zhu was at the M25 Champaign, 28-07-2021, First, Hard with Gijs Brouwer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brouwer and Zhu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Brouwer winning 1 times and Zhu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Brouwer winning 0, and Zhu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brouwer has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.2 while Zhu has played against players with an average rank of 297.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brouwer has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zhu has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brouwer has converted 34.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zhu has converted 38.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brouwer 2 - 0 Zhu
260
Rank
114
High
28
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
520
Rank
271
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
58% (307-225)
Career Total W/L
51% (197-191)
48% (10-11)
YTD W/L
14% (1-6)
$277,135
Career Prize Money
$3,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gijs Brouwer | Evan Zhu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 26 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:30 | 1:33:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (86/136) | 60% (90/151) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (65/86) | 63% (57/90) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (25/50) | 46% (28/61) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 27% (3/11) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (66/151) | 34% (46/136) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 2-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Evan Zhu
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gijs Brouwer | Evan Zhu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (10/11) | 14% (1/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (21/25) | 13% (2/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (230/229) | 33% (43/89) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 44% (4/5) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.49 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 111 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.8 |
| DFs Total | 34 | 52 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:9 | 1:23:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 260.29 | 188.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (990/1435) | 62% (259/417) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (684/990) | 60% (156/259) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (224/445) | 29% (46/158) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (48/142) | 35% (13/37) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (564/1494) | 36% (150/419) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 47% (7/8) | 14% (1/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (10/21) | 14% (1/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 0% (6/0) |
Gijs Brouwer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Gijs Brouwer
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
18 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Dominik Palan
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
Gijs Brouwer
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Gijs Brouwer
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Tristan Boyer
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
5
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
6-0 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Gijs Brouwer
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
50 of
82)
14
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Alexander Blockx
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Ugo Blanchet
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
6
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Gijs Brouwer
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
77%
(
47 of
61)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Evan Zhu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Evan Zhu
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Evan Zhu
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Jose Statham
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
6
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Evan Zhu
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
14)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Evan Zhu
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cooper Williams
Player
Evan Zhu
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
45 of
76)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
52 of
112)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Tyler Bowers
54%
(
63 of
116)
1st Serve %
36%
(
35 of
97)
2
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
42%
(
49 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
112
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Evan Zhu
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Brouwer Vs Zhu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
