Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Gianluca Naso vs Michael Lammer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Naso vs Lammer analysis and find out who is favored!
Gianluca Naso vs Michael Lammer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Naso has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lammer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Naso, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lammer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Naso has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Naso has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lammer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Naso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 410/ 301), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Lammer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 83/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Naso winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Naso winning 2 and Lammer winning 0. The last match between Naso and Lammer was at the Casablanca Challenger, 27-02-2012, First, Clay with Gianluca Naso getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:49.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Naso and Lammer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Naso winning 0 times and Lammer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Naso winning 0, and Lammer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Naso has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lammer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Naso has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Naso has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Naso 1 - 0 Lammer
Ret.
Rank
175
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
150
High
42
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
56% (433-340)
Career Total W/L
55% (399-331)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$98,900
Career Prize Money
$153,020
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Gianluca Naso | Michael Lammer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:49 | 1:23:49 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (29/52) | 65% (39/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (19/29) | 51% (20/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (14/23) | 43% (9/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (31/60) | 37% (19/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Gianluca Naso
Player
Michael Lammer
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Gianluca Naso | Michael Lammer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Gianluca Naso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Gianluca Naso
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
10 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
40
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 1-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Caruana
Player
Gianluca Naso
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Naso
Player
Roberto Marcora
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Gianluca Naso
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Guez
Player
Gianluca Naso
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
82
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enrique Lopez-Perez
Player
Gianluca Naso
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Naso
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Gianluca Naso
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Lammer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Michael Lammer
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marsel Ilhan
Player
Michael Lammer
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Wang
Player
Michael Lammer
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
76)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 7-6(8) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Fischer
Player
Michael Lammer
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
12
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Tom Jomby
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
6
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Maxime Teixeira
38%
(
24 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Lammer
Player
Bruno Volkmann
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 |
Stats
Andreas Seppi
Player
Michael Lammer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
99)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
87
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Gicquel
Player
Michael Lammer
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Naso Vs Lammer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
