Giacomo Crisostomo vs Matic Dimic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 May at 10:03 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Crisostomo vs M. Dimic

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Crisostomo 1 - 0 Dimic
They have played 3 sets in total, with Giacomo Crisostomo winning 2 and Matic Dimic winning 1. The last match between Giacomo Crisostomo and Matic Dimic was at the M15 Warmbad Villach, 27-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Giacomo Crisostomo getting the victory 2-6 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Crisostomo | 1 |
| Dimic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Warmbad Villach(05-27-25)
G. Crisostomo vs M. Dimic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.87% (62-51) | Career Total W/L | 51.05% (97-93) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Crisostomo vs M. Dimic Match Preview:
- How have both players performed on their second serve recently? Dimic has experienced difficulties, winning 0% of points, whereas Crisostomo has a stronger record with 38.36%.
- What about their ability to return second serves? Dimic shows weakness, winning 0% of points, while Crisostomo excels at 44.78%.
- First serve returns present a similar pattern, with Dimic at 0% and Crisostomo at a standout 30.61%.
- Under pressure, Dimic has saved none of their breakpoints, contrasting with Crisostomo's more dependable 33.33% save rate.
- In terms of match wins over the past year, Dimic has a winning percentage of 58.33%, slightly trailing behind Crisostomo's 62.5%.
- Which surface do they excel in? Both players find their best success on clay, with Crisostomo slightly ahead at 57% compared to Dimic's 54%.
- Both players have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Crisostomo’s win rate at 62.5% against Dimic's 58.33% over the last year.
- Should the match reach a deciding set, Dimic has the edge with an 88% win rate, as opposed to Crisostomo’s 67%.
- Against higher-ranked opponents, Crisostomo has faced players with an average rank of 139.88, indicating greater experience compared to Dimic's average opponent rank of 295.53.
- Break point conversion is another key area, with Crisostomo converting an impressive 35.29% of opportunities, while Dimic has yet to convert any.
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
Considering the recent performance, Crisostomo seems to display superior capabilities in almost all critical match statistics. Their second serve points, first and second serve return success, and efficiency in pressure situations mark them as a well-rounded competitor.
Dimic, on the other hand, struggles in areas such as second serve performance, return games, and breakpoint opportunities. While their strength in deciding sets exists, it might not be enough to offset their performance gaps elsewhere.
Based on the facts provided, Crisostomo is the favored player to win this upcoming tennis match. Their consistent advantage across several metrics positions them as the likely victor.
Giacomo Crisostomo vs Matic Dimic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Crisostomo vs M. Dimic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:10:44 | Average Match Time | 2:10:44 |
| 63% (57/91) | 1st Serve % | 59% (42/71) |
| 54% (31/57) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (23/42) |
| 56% (19/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
| 51% (36/71) | Return Points Win % | 45% (41/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Crisostomo Recent Matches Played
M. Dimic Recent Matches Played

G. Crisostomo vs M. Dimic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.87% (62/51) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.05% (97/93) |
| 53.60% (134/116) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.16% (221/211) |
| 52.25% (1230/1124) | Games Win/Loss | 50.59% (2177/2126) |
| 52.63% (10/9) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.62% (20/22) |
| 55.56% (50/40) | Clay Win/Loss | 52.78% (76/68) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 92 | Aces Total | 227 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 138 | Total Double Faults | 232 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 187.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 251.54 |
| 60% (2358/3931) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3651/6050) |
| 60% (1416/2358) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2272/3651) |
| 51% (799/1573) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1070/2399) |
| 47% (203/434) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (254/603) |
| 43% (1725/4027) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2409/5975) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 54.87% (62/51) | Futures W/L | 51.32% (97/92) |
| 55% (62/113) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (97/190) |
| 35% (6/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (18/44) |
| 58% (14/24) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (25/52) |
| 92% (59/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (91/82) |
| 8% (59/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (91/9) |
| 15% (54/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (99/15) |