Prediction of Geraldine Beamish vs Aurea Edgington Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Beamish vs A. Edgington
Geraldine Beamish
GBR
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
9
Win
10
Played
1
Win
140
Age
147
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Aurea Edgington
GBR
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
9
Win
10
Played
1
Win
140
Age
147
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Beamish 9 - 1 Edgington
They have played 24 sets in total, with Geraldine Beamish winning 20 and Aurea Edgington winning 4. The last match between Aurea Edgington and Geraldine Beamish was at the Northwick, 09-05-1927, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Aurea Edgington getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Beamish | 9 |
| Edgington | 1 |
Last 11 H2H Matches:
(SF) Northwick(05-09-27)
Aurea Edgington
6
6
Geraldine Beamish
0
3
(F) Queens Indoors(10-08-25)
Geraldine Beamish
6
6
Aurea Edgington
3
0
() London Indoors(10-09-24)
Geraldine Beamish
6
6
Aurea Edgington
2
2
G. Beamish vs A. Edgington H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 77.85% (608-173) | Career Total W/L | 66.87% (545-270) |
| 2 | Clay | 1 |
| 4 | Grass | 0 |
| 3 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Beamish vs A. Edgington Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geraldine Beamish has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Aurea Edgington has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geraldine Beamish, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Aurea Edgington has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Geraldine Beamish has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Aurea Edgington has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Geraldine Beamish has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Aurea Edgington winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Geraldine Beamish has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 86% (W/L 87/14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 218/67). Aurea Edgington has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 86% (W/L 51/19), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 190/98).
- Player level: In the last year, Geraldine Beamish has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Aurea Edgington has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 11 times before with Geraldine Beamish winning 10 times and Aurea Edgington being victorious 1 times. They have played 24 sets in total, with Geraldine Beamish winning 20 and Aurea Edgington winning 4.
- The last match between Geraldine Beamish and Aurea Edgington was at the Northwick, 09-05-1927, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Aurea Edgington getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geraldine Beamish has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Aurea Edgington has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geraldine Beamish has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Aurea Edgington has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Geraldine Beamish has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Aurea Edgington has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Geraldine Beamish vs Aurea Edgington Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Beamish vs A. Edgington H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 20 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 133 | Games Won | 85 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 91% (10/11) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 9% (1/11) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (9/9) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/9) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Beamish 0%, Edgington 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Beamish 0%, Edgington 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Beamish 0%, Edgington 0%.
G. Beamish Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queens Club Indoors - 16-10-1933 | ||||
R3 Ermyntrude HarveyE. Harvey | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
 Felixstowe East England - 01-08-1933 | ||||
F Lucy BondL. Bond | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
| London Indoors - 10-10-1932 | ||||
R3 Peggy Scriven VivianP. Scriven | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
| Cirencester - 12-09-1932 | ||||
F Phyllis WhitleyP. Whitley | W | 8-6 6-3 | ||
 East Grinstead - 18-07-1932 | ||||
F Elizabeth MacreadyE. Macready | L | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
A. Edgington Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highbury - 15-05-1939 | ||||
R2 J ChalkJ. Chalk | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R3 Beryl RodwayB. Rodway | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
| Queens Club - 13-06-1938 | ||||
R2 O MorrillO. Morrill | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R3 Pam MorrisonP. Morrison | L | 6-1 3-6 RET | ||
| Highbury - 08-05-1938 | ||||
R2 B BakerB. Baker | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
G. Beamish vs A. Edgington Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.85% (608/173) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.87% (545/270) |
| 76.83% (1240/374) | Sets Win/Loss | 65.81% (1128/586) |
| 65.89% (8782/4546) | Games Win/Loss | 58.70% (8768/6168) |
| 76.49% (218/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 67.13% (239/117) |
| 75.93% (41/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64.36% (65/36) |
| 76.83% (262/79) | Grass Win/Loss | 65.97% (190/98) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 62.86% (22/13) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 78% (587/749) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (523/772) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 44% (50/113) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (82/160) |
| 94% (597/564) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (546/492) |
| 6% (597/33) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (546/53) |
| 17% (155/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (234/33) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
S. Baez1WC
A. G. MezaW1
1.25
W2
3.48
02:00 AM 12/11/25
Prediction
F. RoncadelliWCG. A. OlivieriW1
2.4
W2
1.49
10:30 PM 11/11/25
Prediction
L. Musetti
A. D. MinaurW1
2.12
W2
1.76
08:30 PM 11/11/25
Prediction
S. Kozlov
L. BorgW1
1.39
W2
2.72
03:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionT. SachWCD. Sweeny7W1
5
W2
1.128
09:00 PM 11/11/25
Prediction
D. J. Sanchisq
V. GaubasW1
2.43
W2
1.48
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Beibit Zhukayev Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Taylor FritzAlex De MinaurH2H 5-5
Jannik Sinner
Alexander Zverev22:30
H2H 5-4
Jannik SinnerBen SheltonH2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal