Gaia Squarcialupi vs Natalija Senic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Oct at 07:25 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Squarcialupi vs N. Senic

ITA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

SRB
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Squarcialupi 0 - 1 Senic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gaia Squarcialupi winning 0 and Natalija Senic winning 2. The last match between Natalija Senic and Gaia Squarcialupi was at the W35 Heraklion, 15-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Natalija Senic getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Squarcialupi | 0 |
Senic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Heraklion(10-15-25)
G. Squarcialupi vs N. Senic H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
45.52% (127-152) | Career Total W/L | 72.51% (182-69) |
0 | Clay | 1 |
1 | Titles | 8 |
0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
G. Squarcialupi vs N. Senic Match Preview:
- Gaia Squarcialupi outperforms Natalija Senic in recent second serve points, with success rates of 40.38% and 34.15% respectively. Does this suggest an advantage for Squarcialupi in maintaining service games? It certainly hints that way.
- When it comes to returning opponents' second serves, Natalija shines slightly brighter with a 49.78% success rate against Gaia's 47.68%. Could this indicate a potential opportunity for Natalija to create pressure on Gaia's weaker second serves? Likely so.
- In terms of first serve return, Gaia holds a superior rate at 36.13% compared to Natalija's 31.48%, suggesting a stronger ability to break serve. Is this enough to tilt the scales? Perhaps.
- While considering pressure situations, Gaia Squarcialupi excels in saving breakpoints, boasting a 49.54% rate compared to Natalija Senic's 37.09%. Do better breakpoint saves correlate to match success? Often, yes.
- In overall performance, Natalija has a stronger match win rate over the past year at 70.69% versus Gaia's 48.98%, underscoring a potential consistency edge for Natalija.
- Both players perform best on clay, winning 48% of their career matches, but Gaia's experience against higher-ranked opponents might provide her with a competitive edge.
- When matches extend to deciding sets, Natalija holds a significant advantage, winning 50% of such sets compared to Gaia's 25%, which might be crucial in tight situations.
- Event-level experience varies with Gaia playing more at Futures/ITF $10K levels, while Natalija has played at higher Challenger levels, potentially indicating different competitive exposures.
Editorial Prediction (October 15, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze the upcoming tennis match between Gaia Squarcialupi and Natalija Senic, various performance metrics play a crucial role in predicting who might emerge victorious.
Gaia's recent form on the second serve and her adept breakpoint-saving capabilities could give her a slight edge in maintaining her service games. Moreover, her stronger first serve return success might help her to capitalize on breaking Natalija's serve.
However, Natalija's nearly impeccable record of winning 70.69% of her matches over the past year reflects her consistency and proficiency on the tennis court. Her ability to perform under pressure, especially in deciding sets, adds a layer of resilience to her game.
Taking into account the balance between Gaia's competitive exposure to higher-ranked opponents and Natalija’s superior match win-rate and event-level play history, the prediction leans towards Natalija Senic as the more likely winner of this upcoming match.
Gaia Squarcialupi vs Natalija Senic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Squarcialupi vs N. Senic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
5 | Games Won | 12 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:15:11 | Average Match Time | 1:15:11 |
56% (33/59) | 1st Serve % | 44% (20/45) |
45% (15/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (13/20) |
38% (10/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (16/25) |
67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (6/10) |
36% (16/45) | Return Points Win % | 58% (34/59) |
0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Squarcialupi Recent Matches Played
N. Senic Recent Matches Played

G. Squarcialupi vs N. Senic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
45.52% (127/152) | YTD Win/Loss | 72.51% (182/69) |
47.73% (305/334) | Sets Win/Loss | 70.82% (381/157) |
48.17% (2777/2988) | Games Win/Loss | 60.70% (2769/1793) |
34.00% (17/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
48.02% (109/118) | Clay Win/Loss | 73.44% (177/64) |
50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.56% (5/4) |
0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
312 | Aces Total | 257 |
0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
707 | Total Double Faults | 412 |
1:4:17 | Average Match Time | 1:23:10 |
362.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 431.04 |
59% (7537/12674) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7449/12395) |
58% (4408/7537) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (4635/7449) |
43% (2231/5137) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2434/4946) |
49% (741/1523) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 56% (1062/1903) |
45% (5738/12701) | Return Points Win % | 52% (6622/12659) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
47.62% (20/22) | Challenger W/L | 62.69% (42/25) |
45.15% (107/130) | Futures W/L | 75.96% (139/44) |
45% (125/276) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 73% (179/245) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
54% (26/48) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (20/34) |
37% (31/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (21/40) |
80% (145/116) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (182/171) |
20% (145/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (182/11) |
8% (134/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (69/11) |