Gabriel Decamps vs Cristobal Castro Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Decamps vs C. Castro

Gabriel Decamps
BRA
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
32
16'1" (193 cm)
Height
-
775
C. Rank
0
262
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Cristobal Castro
CHI
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
26
Age
32
16'1" (193 cm)
Height
-
775
C. Rank
0
262
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Decamps 1 - 0 Castro
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gabriel Decamps winning 2 and Cristobal Castro winning 0. The last match between Gabriel Decamps and Cristobal Castro was at the Temuco Challenger, 26-11-2023, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Gabriel Decamps getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Decamps | 1 |
| Castro | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Temuco Challenger(11-26-23)
Gabriel Decamps
6
6
Cristobal Castro
2
0
G. Decamps vs C. Castro H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.98% (165-97) | Career Total W/L | 50.91% (28-27) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Decamps vs C. Castro Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gabriel Decamps has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cristobal Castro has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gabriel Decamps, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cristobal Castro has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gabriel Decamps has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cristobal Castro has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gabriel Decamps has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cristobal Castro winning 50.00% (W/L 1/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gabriel Decamps has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 83/41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/12). Cristobal Castro has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 27/25), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Gabriel Decamps has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cristobal Castro has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50.00% of matches (W/L 1/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gabriel Decamps winning 1 times and Cristobal Castro being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gabriel Decamps winning 2 and Cristobal Castro winning 0.
- The last match between Gabriel Decamps and Cristobal Castro was at the Temuco Challenger, 26-11-2023, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Gabriel Decamps getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:48:50.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gabriel Decamps has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cristobal Castro has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gabriel Decamps has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cristobal Castro has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gabriel Decamps has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cristobal Castro has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Gabriel Decamps vs Cristobal Castro Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Decamps vs C. Castro H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 0:48:50 | Average Match Time | 0:48:50 |
| 47% (18/38) | 1st Serve % | 56% (18/32) |
| 83% (15/18) | 1st Serve Win % | 28% (5/18) |
| 60% (12/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 14% (2/14) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (1/2) |
| 78% (25/32) | Return Points Win % | 29% (11/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Decamps 0%, Castro 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Decamps 0%, Castro 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Decamps 0%, Castro 0%.
G. Decamps Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 3-6 5-4 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 3-0 ret. | ||
QF | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
C. Castro Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||

G. Decamps vs C. Castro Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.98% (165/97) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.91% (28/27) |
| 61.17% (356/226) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.17% (59/61) |
| 55.23% (2924/2370) | Games Win/Loss | 49.24% (552/569) |
| 66.94% (83/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 63.06% (70/41) | Clay Win/Loss | 51.92% (27/25) |
| 44.44% (12/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 564 | Aces Total | 15 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 883 | Total Double Faults | 82 |
| 1:18:34 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 424.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 310.2 |
| 61% (8301/13583) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1134/1818) |
| 67% (5602/8301) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (645/1134) |
| 48% (2529/5282) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (273/684) |
| 45% (702/1559) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (73/180) |
| 43% (5991/14014) | Return Points Win % | 40% (700/1758) |
| 48.84% (42/44) | Challenger W/L | 16.67% (2/10) |
| 69.89% (123/53) | Futures W/L | 60.47% (26/17) |
| 64% (162/253) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (27/54) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (26/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
| 58% (34/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (6/10) |
| 91% (155/141) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (27/24) |
| 8% (155/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (27/3) |
| 22% (107/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (28/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction01:45 AM 18/11/25
Prediction05:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
03:05
H2H 0-0
03:30
H2H 0-0
03:50
H2H 0-0
04:05
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal