Frederic Niemeyer vs Jason Marshall Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L W W L W L
Form
L W W L W L L W L WH2H: Niemeyer 1 - 0 Marshall
They have played 2 sets in total, with Niemeyer winning 2 and Marshall winning 0. The last match between Niemeyer and Marshall was at the Canada F3, 19-03-2007, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Frederic Niemeyer getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Frederic Niemeyer | 1 |
| Jason Marshall | 0 |
Canada F3(19-03-2007)
6
4
6
4
| Niemeyer | Stats | Marshall |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 134 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 48 | Age | 46 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 10 | Titles | 1 |
| 54% (250-209) | Career Total W/L | 52% (52-48) |
| $74,370 | Career Prize Money | $1,130 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Frederic Niemeyer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Roger Federer
Player
Frederic Niemeyer
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
12
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
28 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederic Niemeyer
Player
Igor Kunitsyn
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kevin Anderson
Player
Frederic Niemeyer
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederic Niemeyer
Player
Michael Yani
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederic Niemeyer
Player
Alexander Kudryavtsev
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
65%
(
22 of
34)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
51
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Go Soeda
Player
Frederic Niemeyer
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Frederic Niemeyer
Player
Samuel Groth
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
49%
(
54 of
110)
5
Aces
15
6
Double Faults
9
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Jason Marshall Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Justin O'Neal
Player
Jason Marshall
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lars Burgsmuller
Player
Jason Marshall
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Marshall
Player
Hugo Armando
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
8
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (250/209) | Win/Loss | 52% (52/48) |
| 54% (594/500) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (111/115) |
| 52% (5596/5226) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (1085/1074) |
| 48% (95/105) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (29/31) |
| 38% (18/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) |
| 67% (100/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (15/9) |
| 59% (37/26) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 333 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.04 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 197 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 486.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 356.8 |
| 56% (1652/2952) | 1st Serve % | 55% (94/171) |
| 74% (1228/1652) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (72/94) |
| 48% (630/1310) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (42/77) |
| 34% (82/242) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 30% (3/10) |
| 36% (1109/3063) | Return Points Win % | 32% (61/189) |
| 36% (15/27) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 24% (5/16) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (8/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (28/32) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (167/115) | Challenger W/L | 49% (26/27) |
| 79% (27/7) | Futures W/L | 58% (22/16) |
| 55% (239/431) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (52/100) |
| 37% (7/19) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (107/215) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (12/31) |
| 48% (75/157) | Deciding Set Win % | 73% (19/26) |
| 79% (263/207) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (50/45) |
| 21% (263/55) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (50/5) |
| 22% (195/43) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (50/7) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
