Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Frank Dancevic vs Tatsuma Ito Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Dancevic vs Ito analysis and find out who is favored!
Frank Dancevic vs Tatsuma Ito Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dancevic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ito has won 52.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dancevic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ito has won 48.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dancevic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ito has saved 56.25% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dancevic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ito winning 50% (W/L 16/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dancevic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 103/ 67), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 95/ 78). Ito has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 356/ 275), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 33/ 33).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Dancevic winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Dancevic winning 4 and Ito winning 4. The last match between Dancevic and Ito was at the U.S. Open - New York, 23-08-2013, Q3, Hard with Frank Dancevic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Dancevic and Ito have played a deciding set 2 times, with Dancevic winning 2 times and Ito 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Dancevic winning 0, and Ito 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dancevic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ito has played against players with an average rank of 148.31.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dancevic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ito has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dancevic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ito has converted 38.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Dancevic 2 - 1 Ito
Ret.
Rank
65
High
39
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
766
Rank
60
High
35
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
57% (500-370)
Career Total W/L
57% (552-420)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$779,866
Career Prize Money
$790,345
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Frank Dancevic | Tatsuma Ito |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 37 | 35 |
| Aces (Total) | 15 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:18 | 1:39:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (129/233) | 53% (123/234) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (92/129) | 69% (85/123) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (49/104) | 51% (57/111) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (10/21) | 38% (10/26) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (92/234) | 39% (92/233) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Frank Dancevic
Player
Tatsuma Ito
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
51%
(
61 of
119)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
42%
(
46 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
119)
117
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Frank Dancevic
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
100%
(
20 of
20)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-1 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Tatsuma Ito
48%
(
32 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Frank Dancevic | Tatsuma Ito |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 39% (20/31) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.36 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:27:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (111/182) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (63/111) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (35/71) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 29% (4/14) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (64/177) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Frank Dancevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Frank Dancevic
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
2
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
2
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
26 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frank Dancevic
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
7
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Frank Dancevic
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
20 of
23)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Frank Dancevic
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
11
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Alexander Sarkissian
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
58 of
102)
14
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Lucas Miedler
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
82%
(
18 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Takanyi Garanganga
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Frank Dancevic
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
22 of
29)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Frank Dancevic
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
22 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frank Dancevic
Player
Brayden Schnur
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
12
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Tatsuma Ito Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kohei Hayashi
Player
Tatsuma Ito
68%
(
88 of
130)
1st Serve %
53%
(
65 of
122)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
38%
(
50 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
51 of
122)
131
Total Points Won
121
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kousuke Ogura
Player
Tatsuma Ito
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Tatsuma Ito
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Ray Ho
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Hikaru Shiraishi
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Tatsuma Ito
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
8
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhe Li
Player
Tatsuma Ito
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Sanhui Shin
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sora Fukuda
Player
Tatsuma Ito
50%
(
13 of
26)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
2
Aces
3
-
Double Faults
-
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
4 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
46
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tatsuma Ito
Player
Koki Matsuda
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
94
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Dancevic Vs Ito Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
