Francisco Comesana vs Michael Mmoh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Mar at 08:19 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
F. Comesana vs M. Mmoh

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Comesana 1 - 0 Mmoh
They have played 2 sets in total, with Francisco Comesana winning 2 and Michael Mmoh winning 0. The last match between Francisco Comesana and Michael Mmoh was at the Miami Open - Miami, 17-03-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Francisco Comesana getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Comesana | 1 |
| Mmoh | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Miami Open - Miami(03-17-25)
F. Comesana vs M. Mmoh H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,039,600 | Career Prize Money | $1,274,430 |
| 62.92% (297-175) | Career Total W/L | 57.71% (303-222) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 11 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 45.24% (19-23) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.00% (2-3) |
F. Comesana vs M. Mmoh Match Preview:
When examining recent second serve performance over the past six months, Comesana has demonstrated an advantage, winning 48.38% of points compared to Mmoh's 45.68%. This statistic often correlates highly with the prediction accuracy of match outcomes.
The performance overview over the last year shows that Comesana has a strong winning percentage, having won 60.29% of his matches (W/L 41/27), whereas Mmoh has managed a respectable 55% (W/L 11/9). Analyzing the best surface statistics, Comesana excels on Clay with a 66% win rate (W/L 252/132), whereas Mmoh shows preference for Indoor hard courts, boasting a 63% win rate (W/L 69/41).
In terms of return game effectiveness, Comesana has won 45.76% of points on opponents' second serves in recent form, while Mmoh has succeeded slightly more at 47.77%. For first serve returns, Comesana secures 27.06% compared to Mmoh's 29.05%, which can influence predictions in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, Comesana's ability to save break points stands at 56.6%, versus Mmoh's 53.04%, providing insight into their capability to handle critical in-game scenarios. Break point conversion rates reveal that Comesana converts 32.99% of his opportunities, whereas Mmoh is slightly more efficient with 37.97% conversion.
Player levels play a significant role in predictions, with Comesana primarily competing in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, achieving a 68.18% success rate (W/L 30/14). In contrast, Mmoh has played in higher-level main tour events, attaining a 72.73% win rate (W/L 8/3).
Considering opponent quality, Comesana's matches over the past 12 months have been against players with an average rank of 200.59, compared to Mmoh's opponents averaging a rank of 163.35. In high-stakes situations requiring decisive set wins, Comesana's 72% success rate over the past year surpasses Mmoh's 50%.
While past player performance remains a vital component in predicting outcomes, ongoing event statistics can offer crucial insights, especially for players who excel at particular events. Given the data, the prediction leans towards a narrow victory for Comesana, primarily due to his superior overall second serve performance and adeptness in deciding sets.
Francisco Comesana vs Michael Mmoh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
F. Comesana vs M. Mmoh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:27:55 | Average Match Time | 1:27:55 |
| 72% (48/67) | 1st Serve % | 74% (39/53) |
| 77% (37/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (29/39) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 21% (3/14) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Pts Won % | 13% (1/8) |
| 40% (21/53) | Return Points Win % | 31% (21/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
F. Comesana Recent Matches Played
M. Mmoh Recent Matches Played

F. Comesana vs M. Mmoh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.92% (297/175) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.71% (303/222) |
| 60.15% (652/432) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.88% (694/548) |
| 53.61% (5466/4729) | Games Win/Loss | 52.27% (6158/5623) |
| 52.83% (28/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.56% (190/129) |
| 65.19% (264/141) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (30/36) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.61% (72/43) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 44.00% (11/14) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 1503 | Aces Total | 2292 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 816 | Total Double Faults | 1710 |
| 1:32:35 | Average Match Time | 1:36:31 |
| 345.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 488.34 |
| 66% (18227/27507) | 1st Serve % | 66% (22549/34322) |
| 67% (12231/18227) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (15753/22549) |
| 50% (4632/9280) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5722/11773) |
| 44% (1334/3057) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1420/3419) |
| 42% (11843/28222) | Return Points Win % | 39% (13462/34455) |
| 47.06% (8/9) | Slam W/L | 43.64% (24/31) |
| 59.09% (13/9) | Masters W/L | 26.92% (7/19) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.03% (16/23) | Main Tour W/L | 50.62% (41/40) |
| 66.25% (106/54) | Challenger W/L | 62.16% (184/112) |
| 66.09% (154/79) | Futures W/L | 70.15% (47/20) |
| 64% (285/448) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (289/482) |
| 50% (7/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 34% (10/29) |
| 51% (69/135) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (92/176) |
| 59% (75/128) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (90/165) |
| 90% (284/256) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (306/259) |
| 10% (284/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (306/46) |
| 22% (188/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (219/44) |