Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Francisco Cerundolo vs Daniel Cukierman Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cerundolo vs Cukierman analysis and find out who is favored!
Francisco Cerundolo vs Daniel Cukierman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cerundolo has won 50.37% of points on his second serve, while Cukierman has won 48.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cerundolo, in recent form, has won 49.78% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cukierman has won 58.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.06% and 36.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cerundolo has saved 60.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cukierman has saved 47.54% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cerundolo has won 57.14% of matches played (W/L 36/ 27), with Cukierman winning 61.9% (W/L 39/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cerundolo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 242/ 105), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 7/ 10). Cukierman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 44/ 28), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Cerundolo has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13), where as Cukierman has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.54% of matches (W/L 24/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cerundolo winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cerundolo winning 2 and Cukierman winning 0. The last match between Cerundolo and Cukierman was at the M25 Los Angeles, 10-01-2020, Second, Hard with Francisco Cerundolo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cerundolo and Cukierman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cerundolo winning 0 times and Cukierman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cerundolo winning 0, and Cukierman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cerundolo has played against opponents with an average rank of 153.27 while Cukierman has played against players with an average rank of 240.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cerundolo has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cukierman has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cerundolo has converted 44.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cukierman has converted 45.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cerundolo 1 - 0 Cukierman
22
Rank
19
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
416
Rank
339
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
66% (289-149)
Career Total W/L
58% (246-179)
48% (12-13)
YTD W/L
61% (14-9)
$2,827,900
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Francisco Cerundolo | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (39/56) | 68% (39/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (26/39) | 46% (18/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (6/17) | 61% (11/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (28/57) | 43% (24/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Daniel Cukierman
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Francisco Cerundolo | Daniel Cukierman |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (12/13) | 61% (14/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (31/33) | 61% (33/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (312/308) | 55% (268/218) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 67% (12/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 76 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 68 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:22 | 1:43:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 207.96 | 256.96 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1376/2055) | 63% (921/1472) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (898/1376) | 68% (627/921) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (342/679) | 48% (266/551) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (80/178) | 45% (87/192) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (751/1925) | 44% (719/1617) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (13/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (11/23) | 61% (14/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 43% (3/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 92% (13/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 8% (13/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 20% (10/2) |
Francisco Cerundolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
23 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Alexander Zverev
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Fabian Marozsan
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 | bye | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
71%
(
91 of
128)
1st Serve %
77%
(
81 of
105)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
43 of
81)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
48%
(
61 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
116
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Federico Coria
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
49%
(
31 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Daniel Altmaier
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Cukierman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Daniel Cukierman
65%
(
72 of
110)
1st Serve %
73%
(
61 of
83)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
29%
(
11 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
50 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Richard Zusman
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Daniel Cukierman
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Mateo Barreiros Reyes
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
49
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Ignacio Carou
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Daniel Cukierman
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Carlos Sanchez Jover
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cukierman
Player
Wilson Leite
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Cerundolo Vs Cukierman Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Francisco Cerundolo
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
