Fiona Crawley vs Nicole Coopersmith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Crawley vs Coopersmith analysis and find out who is favored!
Fiona Crawley vs Nicole Coopersmith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Crawley has won 50.89% of points on his second serve, while Coopersmith has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Crawley, in recent form, has won 60.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coopersmith has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 49.03% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Crawley has saved 62.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coopersmith has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Crawley has won 84% of matches played (W/L 21/ 4), with Coopersmith winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Crawley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 78% (W/L 31/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Coopersmith has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 27/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Crawley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 88.89% of matches (W/L 16/ 2), where as Coopersmith has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Crawley winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Crawley winning 0 and Coopersmith winning 2. The last match between Crawley and Coopersmith was at the Lubbock, 19-09-2017, First, Hard with Nicole Coopersmith getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Crawley and Coopersmith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Crawley winning 0 times and Coopersmith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Crawley winning 0, and Coopersmith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Crawley has played against opponents with an average rank of 272.04 while Coopersmith has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Crawley has won 78% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coopersmith has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Crawley has converted 50.85% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coopersmith has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Crawley 0 - 1 Coopersmith
2
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
387
Rank
371
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
791
Rank
475
High
24
Age
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
72% (31-12)
Career Total W/L
53% (64-56)
100% (5-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$81,500
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Crawley VS Coopersmith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Fiona Crawley | Nicole Coopersmith |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 9 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 13 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:0 | 1:33:0 |
1st Serve % | 51% (44/87) | 67% (42/63) |
1st Serve Win% | 68% (30/44) | 52% (22/42) |
2nd Serve Win% | 28% (12/43) | 62% (13/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 46% (6/13) |
Return Points W% | 44% (28/63) | 52% (45/87) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Crawley VS Coopersmith H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-4 |
Nicole Coopersmith
Player
Fiona Crawley
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
13
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
12 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Fiona Crawley | Nicole Coopersmith |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 83% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 64% (69/39) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.06 | 0 |
Aces Total | 3 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
DFs Total | 14 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:56:24 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 261.8 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (236/348) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (149/236) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (57/112) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 51% (30/59) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 53% (205/387) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Fiona Crawley Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Ashley Lahey
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
109)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
53 of
109)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Olivia Lincer
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Liv Hovde
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Carson Branstine
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Thea Frodin
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
F |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Chloe Beck
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Tyra Caterina Grant
76%
(
78 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
110)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Nicole Khirin
73%
(
67 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
11
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Sophie Chang
83%
(
53 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fiona Crawley
Player
Catherine Harrison
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Nicole Coopersmith Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Christina Rosca
Player
Nicole Coopersmith
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
25 of
36)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Hanna Chang
Player
Nicole Coopersmith
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
80%
(
37 of
46)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nicole Coopersmith
Player
Katerina Stewart
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicole Coopersmith
Player
Victoria Hu
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nicole Coopersmith
Player
Allura Zamarripa
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Maria Sanchez
Player
Nicole Coopersmith
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more