Finn Tearney vs Jarmere Jenkins Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tearney vs Jenkins analysis and find out who is favored!
Finn Tearney vs Jarmere Jenkins Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tearney has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Jenkins has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tearney, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jenkins has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tearney has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jenkins has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tearney has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Jenkins winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tearney has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 136/ 93). Jenkins has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 106/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tearney winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tearney winning 1 and Jenkins winning 4. The last match between Tearney and Jenkins was at the Australia F6, 30-09-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Jarmere Jenkins getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:45:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tearney and Jenkins have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tearney winning 0 times and Jenkins 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Tearney winning 1, and Jenkins 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tearney has played against opponents with an average rank of while Jenkins has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tearney has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jenkins has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tearney has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jenkins has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tearney 0 - 2 Jenkins
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Ret.
Rank
356
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
190
High
33
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
60% (148-99)
Career Total W/L
63% (152-90)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$4,555
Career Prize Money
$835
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Finn Tearney | Jarmere Jenkins |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
Games Won | 16 | 30 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 16 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:30 | 1:45:30 |
1st Serve % | 68% (101/148) | 57% (97/171) |
1st Serve Win% | 53% (54/101) | 62% (60/97) |
2nd Serve Win% | 34% (16/47) | 54% (40/74) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (6/21) | 68% (13/19) |
Return Points W% | 42% (71/171) | 53% (78/148) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Finn Tearney
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 |
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Finn Tearney
61%
(
69 of
114)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
12
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
50 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Finn Tearney | Jarmere Jenkins |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Finn Tearney Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Finn Tearney
Player
Anton Shepp
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Finn Tearney
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Finn Tearney
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
53 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Finn Tearney
Player
Ching Ho Sunny Yue
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Finn Tearney
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Harry Bourchier
Player
Finn Tearney
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
50%
(
6 of
12)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
17
Total Points Won
9
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Finn Tearney
Player
Rishab Agarwal
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Finn Tearney
Player
Matthew Clegg
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Jarmere Jenkins Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Darren K. Polkinghorne
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
47%
(
20 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
44
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Jesse Delaney
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
F | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
SF |
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
N.Sriram Balaji
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
4
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Gavin Van Peperzeel
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
David Barclay
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
19
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jarmere Jenkins
Player
Thomas Fancutt
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shuichi Sekiguchi
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gavin Van Peperzeel
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
9
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Jarmere Jenkins
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more